English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That's nice...what about the billion other species that existed in other geologic time periods, do you "think: these species never existed, then why all the fossils? Do you "think" that these billions of species co-existed with all the all the modern animals that we have today before the 'Great Flood'?

Quaternary (1.8 mya to today)
Holocene (10,000 years to today)
Pleistocene (1.8 mya to 10,000 yrs)
Tertiary (65 to 1.8 mya)
Pliocene (5.3 to 1.8 mya)
Miocene (23.8 to 5.3 mya)
Oligocene (33.7 to 23.8 mya)
Eocene (54.8 to 33.7 mya)
Paleocene (65 to 54.8 mya)

Mesozoic Era
(248 to 65 mya) Cretaceous (144 to 65 mya)
Jurassic (206 to 144 mya)
Triassic (248 to 206 mya)

Paleozoic Era
(543 to 248 mya) Permian (290 to 248 mya)
Carboniferous (354 to 290 mya)
Pennsylvanian (323 to 290 mya)
Mississippian (354 to 323 mya)
Devonian (417 to 354 mya)
Silurian (443 to 417 mya)
Ordovician (490 to 443 mya)

2007-10-18 14:44:54 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Cambrian (543 to 490 mya)
Tommotian (530 to 527 mya)

Precambrian Time (4,500 to 543 mya)

2007-10-18 14:45:01 · update #1

They don't even understand the question..
Surprise, surprise.

2007-10-18 14:54:23 · update #2

This question isn't about dinosaurs living with people, it's about every other lifeform but dinosaurs that living with people. The question is not that hard to understand...

2007-10-18 15:00:44 · update #3

14 answers

I don't think many of them can actually understand how many species existed before us. And anyway, I was once informed by a Creationist that dinosaurs never existed, and that the bones were put there by God when the earth was made. It was hard to keep a straight face at that statement.

2007-10-18 14:53:59 · answer #1 · answered by JavaGirl ~AM~ 4 · 1 1

yeah, buddy, and they drove foot-peddled vehicles too. Many years ago, dinosaur tracks were discovered that showed what appeared to be human feet prints walking next to them--like a boy walking his dino for a potty break. Scientists have since shown, several times, that these tracks were from animals sinking and sliding in the mud, and not made by humans. You don't know how many times I've had some little pr1ck tell me humans lived with dinosaurs. The biggest problem with the creationist view is that --where are the dinos that Noah must have saved? And, why did Noah irresponsibly sacrifice endangered animals after coming out of the ark? Doesn't god conserve anything or is he so uncaring for his animals? People would have made fast food snacks if they lived with dinosaurs.

2007-10-18 14:53:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Some people point out those fossiles in Texas, but there is a problem with them. The human footprint is consistently in the same position relative to the dino print. Why would a hunter hop from one print to the next, and how did he hit the same spot on every print? Never landing on a toe print or beside the print? The fact is, those footprints are just what that kind of dino print looks like.

2016-05-23 13:18:37 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Yes, many people believe that humans and dinosaurs once coexisted. One of the favorite pieces of evidence, I believe, is a human footprint supposedly found inside of a dinosaur footprint.

Now, this isn't meant to be offensive, I'm simply noting what I've seen. But a lot of really hardcore creationists don't care what scientific evidence you throw at them. You can explain the process of evolution or point them toward carbon-dating samples, but they're going to find some reason not to believe you. They structure their entire lives around this one belief system, and it is much easier for them to dismiss scientific data and continue believing than it is for them to learn what all this stuff means and reevaluate their entire belief system. People just don't usually have that kind of time.

So it's not really that they strongly believe that dinosaurs existed with humans. They didn't research it and come to a scientific conclusion. It's just the state of affairs that best coincides with the belief system they already hold to be true.

2007-10-18 14:55:41 · answer #4 · answered by illithid253 2 · 0 0

I believe the earth was organized by material already in existance not just poofed up out of nothing. I also dont know how long adam and eve were in the garden of eden.

I think there is a lot that all sides of the story dont know about the creation of this planet and the beginning of life and its pretty arrogant for either side to claim they really know.




Creationists can also claim that God put all these fossils on the earth to test the faith of people, too.
You cant disprove God using science because belief in God isnt based on science. If a person believes that god can do anything then nothing is impossible.
Religious person shouldnt fear science either, becuase they dont know if God works thru scientific means and we dont have all the science yet.

2007-10-18 14:51:29 · answer #5 · answered by cadisneygirl 7 · 0 2

There are creationists who believe that dinosaurs and humans existed at the same time because they believe that there was no death prior to the fall of Adam and Eve, so as many dinosaurs were carnivors (something had to die), they are not able to place dinosaurs' existance prior to that of humans. Sorry I couldn't be more scientific.

2007-10-18 14:51:41 · answer #6 · answered by Candii JoJo is a groovy chick. 5 · 0 2

you cant fool me with your science nonsense. We all know that the world is 6000 yrs old, adam and eve where made 6-6000 yrs after the world was made, and that dinosaurs never existed.

ha ha ha just kidding, but thats some answers your going to get

2007-10-18 14:49:15 · answer #7 · answered by Fish&Rice 2 · 2 1

I believe they lived at the same time as other humanoid (not human) species: Cro-mag non, Neanderthal etc.

2007-10-18 14:54:22 · answer #8 · answered by Nels 7 · 0 0

Why am I not surprised by the lack of Creationists answering this question?

2007-10-18 15:22:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't quite understand what your point is,or if you're asking a question. In any event,few people other than atheists seem to care what fundies think. I know I don't. Why waste our time attacking so-called "creationism"? It's not exactly a mainstream belief.

2007-10-18 14:51:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers