2007-10-18 14:32:45 · 22 answers · asked by 123 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Although I'm tempted to agree with that I do realize that a lot of other posters here are right. There would be way too many subcategories and R&S wouldn't be the same. It's more interesting to be able to read what everybody thinks and feels. This is a question and answer forum. Yahoo and MSN has their own sites for all denominations, atheists, pagans, wiccans. I'm a Seventh Day Adventist and I have a Adventist group contact that Yahoo hosts. So if I want to go see what my fellow believers are talking about then "click' I'm there.
2007-10-18 15:24:30 · answer #1 · answered by angelcat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that is an enticing question. i imagine that subdividing the category is an argument of Semitics. One persons idea of what's faith and what's non secular is yet another persons opposite. that is a tender challenge also. What might want to be strong might want to be to position personality checks into the categorizations so human beings style of comprehend the historic past personalities at the same time as they are having a contextual communicate so each and every-different is conscious the basis of what's declared and by no skill suggested. That being because it may, their also must be rules like a symposium so human beings can concentration the discussions into genuine communicative and critical blogs. i love chatting like the subsequent individual, yet I cant allow you to comprehend the way many situations something totally off topic is extra up. That receives annoying. also human beings trashing each and every-different is a situation. Subdividing styles of "knowledgeable" and "Layperson" will be a robust massive massive difference also. in my opinion My type of non secular can be a hybrid of many diverse beliefs. I also like a robust dose of technological expertise into my faith so it isn't blind, also i might want to opt for to verify technological expertise as a non secular type. i love Gnostic early christian idea. i imagine that that is on factor.
2016-10-21 09:42:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't be near as interesting...I like controversy. I learn things...about the others views. But since I am a child of God, I don't go out on a limb too much trying to understand them...I might fall off the family tree.... : ) I'm kidding...unless someone cut the limb off,,,I am not falling and God won't allow that to happen anyway... I can't be plucked from his hand. So, let the battle begin.
2007-10-18 14:46:32 · answer #3 · answered by dreamdress2 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't it be better if yahoo subdivided the movie section into every movie they ever made?
2007-10-18 14:36:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
No. People of all religions and of no religions need Christ. If we were kept apart, there would be no point in coming here.
2007-10-18 14:41:24 · answer #5 · answered by teran_realtor 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes I agree, but we'd quit arguing, I think 1/2 the people here are here to argue.
2007-10-18 14:37:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do you have any idea how many subcategories that'd require? Why can't it just be about Religion and Spirituality, and not YOUR Religion and Spirituality?
2007-10-18 14:38:31 · answer #7 · answered by nobody important 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I cannot answer this question any better than Mike- a relationship with Christ is the remedy for religion
2007-10-18 14:36:13 · answer #8 · answered by AdoreHim 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No it,s kind of interesting the way it is,we all get to tell
our thought,s and here from other,s,we may not agree
but we all have the right to say it.
2007-10-18 14:44:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
There would be too many unless they did:
monotheism, polytheism, atheism (ok, not a religion), agnostic & other
2007-10-18 14:37:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋