I am enlightened by the answer that pointed out that evolution happens all the time because reproduction is an

Question

iffy thing. Read the first part to get the idea here -

The way to understand our origins is to remember that living organisms are in a state of constant change - It's not that evolution *can* occur, but that it *must* occur, simply because there is no mechanism in living organisms to ensure perfect, flawless reproduction for ever.

Suppose you could study a population of chimpanzees in the jungle, on a timescale of millions of years. Clearly, each individual only lives a few decades, so the population is constantly being succeeded by individuals which are different from their parents, because reproduction is imperfect - and remember, this is *inevitable*. It can't *not* happen. All the time this population is inter-breeding, the genes are getting mixed together, and only genes which work well with all other chimpanzee genes will tend to get passed down to successive generations (because individuals with genes that don't work well together will tend not to survive and reproduce).

Answer 1

If evolution was true ,we could have blood transfusion,s
from ape,s and even orgin transplant,s being so close
to them so I cannot believe in evolution as all this and I
know that God created it all.

Answer 2

The main scientific objection to the the theory of evolution is not that changes occur through time, and neither is it about the size of the change The key issue is the type of change required—to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content. The three billion DNA ‘letters’ stored in each human cell nucleus convey a great deal more information (known as ‘specified complexity’) than the over half a million DNA ‘letters’ of the ‘simplest’ self-reproducing organism. The DNA sequences in a ‘higher’ organism, such as a human, code for structures and functions unknown in the sort of ‘primitive first cell’ from which all other organisms are said to have evolved.
NONE of the alleged proofs of ‘evolution in action’ provide a single example of functional new information being added to genes. Rather, they all involve sorting and loss of information.

Answer 3

Dr C? - I'm sorry. I was on my way to bed and I took one last look. You do know we're speaking about walking, talking snakes here. I know that snakes did not ever speak. I also know that they did, at one time have legs; but much further back than 6000 years ago. In the living world there is no opposite. All life is connected through DNA.

Answer 4

Gee, Mate, Is that "a revelation"??!!

I'll give you some real revelation:
Let's see if you truly recognize it:

I'm glad you brought this topic up, because Kinesiological genius, Denis Towers, recently published a book via Xulon Press.com called TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!!, which actually proves following a 9 year research into the fact that the typical snake is the precise antithesis of man both - anatomically and behaviorally.
It has proven a highly intriguing, most fascinating and highly revelatory study.
Of course, this finding not only tends to disprove 'evolution', by clearly indicating that some conscious deliberate decision-making was involved in Creation, but it also Powerfully supports the Biblical Adam and Eve account, wherein it was the serpent who set man in opposition to God.
For its 'fruits of labor', God cursed the snake 'above all the beasts of the field' as holy writ says ... and made significant changes to it, as recorded in scripture.
What this study shows is that the changes made were such as to represent the complete opposite of man and God [in whose image we were created] beset upon by the snake - through whom Satan spoke to Adam and Eve.

So that the most unbelievable account in the entire holy record has become the very one that we have most scientifically proven!!!!!

It is indeed a most intriguing, diabolical world since the snake expressed its opposition to Man and God.
It is, indeed, a most encompassing and faith-promoting study.
I have known people so inspired by the work as to read it twice in the first week they had it.


So: Believing in Evolution?:


Certainly not ...
A prime reason is because true modern Kinesiological genius, D Towers, over his recent 9 year research, in his work, ‘TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!!', discovered, unequivocally, that Man and the snake are precise opposites of one another! ... in ALL aspects - both functionally anatomically and behaviorally!
That is eerie!!!

But once we have recovered from the shock of this oh so central, yet simple discovery, we immediately realize that only an absolute Master mind could have possibly engineered such, and that random mutation certainly wasn't 'random", if at all!!

The other gravital realization that strikes hard is that this discovery overwhelmingly supports the Biblical Adam and Eve, wherein it was the snake [serpent] who tempted Eve to oppose God, and set up "opposition in all things' in the first place!
God obviously represented that opposition to man and God in His subsequent 'curseing' of the creature, part of which is also represented Biblically!

Those who religiously 'hail' 'Biological Evolution of the Species' as some genuine, realistic, form of life source explanation:
BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD NOW, AND WORK ON THAT ONE!!


Source(s)
Two Birds ... One Stone!!
by Denis Towers
published Xulonpress.com 2007

Answer 5

yeah, genetic mutation (that is to say, imperfect reproduction) is inevitable, and that is why creationists must believe that there are no beneficial mutations. it is not enough for them that beneficial mutations are relatively rare compared to neutral or deleterious mutations, because by their nature they will tend to increase in the population after they occur. beneficial mutations must be extremely rare, such that one would never show up in a single organism in hundreds of generations of a population of organisms undergoing imperfect reproduction, in order for creationists to be correct. there is no evidence that beneficial mutations are anywhere near that rare.

Answer 6

Yes.

That is evolution.

Quite simple and quite elegant.

Answer 7

Gazoo is right. I learned this in Grade school science class.
Are you just hearing about it now?

Answer 8

Yep. Congratulations, you can get through fourth grade science.