OMG, is that painting so old it's growing hair? What kind of crap museum lets it's paintings grow old like that? And seriously, when you saw that story, were you immediately riveted and fascinated, or were you like "Huh? and this is headline news WHY?"
2007-10-18 08:44:24 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Painting
Maybe we should go to the Louvre with tweezers in vigil...
2007-10-18 09:19:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The painting isn't growing hair! And its 500 years old, the pigments are going to decompose, there's nothing the museum can do about it while retaining the integrity of the painting. If you had actually read the article, it said that possibly a couple hundred years ago someone might have done a bad job of cleaning the area around the eyes and washed away the eyelashes and eyebrows. And yes, I was interested in the story. Its fascinating that someone has developed a camera that can detect things like that. Think of what else it could be used for!
2007-10-18 13:26:40 · answer #2 · answered by Danielle 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I always thought she looked rather manly. Just like dear old mum! *sniff*
2007-10-18 08:51:17 · answer #3 · answered by Armless Joe, Bipedal Foe 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yea... I was all like... what's the big deal?
2007-10-18 08:49:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
do you mean unibrow riegan?
then you'd love me *wink wink*
2007-10-18 09:04:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think she'd be sexy with a monabrow
2007-10-18 08:48:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋