English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20071018/sc_livescience/chattycavemenmeneanderthaltalkjustfine

What do you think about it?

2007-10-18 06:49:17 · 13 answers · asked by Nickel-for-your-thoughts 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/2007...

What do you think about it?

Wow, all these assumptions about
what I believe based on my
"type-o"!

Ok, to clarify: I see SO many
problems with macro evolution.
The information changes and
gets "rearranged" all the time
to try to squeeze in the idea.
Patterns are quite arbitrary when
you look at it close enough.
I don't have any problem with
micro evolution or science,
just with pseudo-science!
Neanderthals are thought
by some to actually BE humans,
thus the ability to talk!

2007-10-18 07:17:57 · update #1

13 answers

Of course the body has evolved from "something"
It is not of importance, really, that is historic, what is important is now, this moment.

What is important is the soul/spirit/heart of man
That is what "God" is about.

People think because evolvtion can be "proved" it means God does not exist.

Wrong
God exists,
The body is the "casing" around the soul/spirit/heart.
The body has needs.
The soul/spirit/heart is the "aspect" "evolving" to "enlightenment" and within that the body/mind would be disciplined and the "word" or "light" would be the "master" of the body/mind. Instead of the ego controlling people, and keeping people limited and bound.

Whereas now the "re-action" continues with ego/mind/body and the soul/spirit/heart.

Scientists embraces science, that is the mind/body, evolving we trust, in line with what "spirituality" always, and already knows.

This argument is tiring, boring and childlike.

Lets us all just drop the act, the body/mind/ego is projected out of the heart as a consequence to how the "being" has lived as "enlightenment in training"

Some beings are enlightened "enough" to be able to "understand" that there is God, always was, always will be.
This is not the controlling God of some "religions"

The ego "loves" the "debates" it is giving it "power" "energy" .
The ego is about identification, competition, differentation.

God is the Heart of all, the light, love, the animator.

The mind cannot grasp this, the ego will not allow it, it would have to relinquish the "hold" it has in identification.
The mind is an activity, it is a function.

For the ego to "get it" would be the beginning of "the end" for the egoic stance, hence war, unhappiness, greed, fear etc. would dissolve, nothing would be sustaining it.
God does not sustain fear. The ego/mind/body does.
God is love.

If all beings embraced the true understanding and knew without a "doubt" who they were, what "life" was, the world would shift at a phemonenal rate.

That is the fear that drives the ego.

If we knew who we were, how creative we are, it would then mean we would have to take responsibility in this life.

People do not want to take responsibility, it would seize to be "Fun Park".

Blessings to you for the question.

2007-10-18 07:20:55 · answer #1 · answered by Astro 5 · 0 0

What is your point? You are obviously trying to make one.

There is no definitive answer. However, evolution is a fact, the mechanism is still theory. Just because a person is a nonbeliever does not mean they know how we came about. I find it fascinating that believers think this. Many Atheist constantly question & that might explain the reason we are Atheists. When you ask, you learn. Again, I believe evolution as of right now, but as science & theories change so do my views. Why must ppl be so definitive? We weren't born with all the answers, but we are slowly gaining knowledge. You must go with logic, evidence, etc.

Do you have a problem relating yourself to a caveman? As I said before, what is your point, I ask because of the way you spelled evolution in your question. You apparently are not aware of science & theories. You are a believer of mankind's religions & dogma so you will not look at science without a blindfold.

Add- Give me a break, typo. That was a blatant misspelling. Evilootion? Come on! You also stated mankind's. As if it were fallible because it wasn't God's word. Your intentions were quite clear!

2007-10-18 14:02:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

always assumed they could communicate-there are sites where we lived together for quite a period of time-also there was a major change in their technology when our paths crossed--didnt need a science article to confirm what i assumed to be true but it doesnt hurt--smile and enjoy the day

2007-10-18 13:55:55 · answer #3 · answered by lazaruslong138 6 · 2 0

Just becuse it dosent fit with your little poetic perfect view of Jesus and God doesnt mean its not how God wanted things.

Who are you to question God's way? If he is indeed all powerful and all knowing and we are weak and small like the bible says we are. You are sinning with your vain pride.

2007-10-18 13:55:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Interesting, might be possible, but who knows for sure. Hopefully we get more samples and learn more about it to answer the questions posed.

Either that or we could claim they never existed and that their bones are tricks from satan.

2007-10-18 13:54:45 · answer #5 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 4 0

Why are you predisposing responses by a ridiculous spelling of Evolution? Would you feel better if people referred to Christianity as "Crapianity"...

2007-10-18 13:54:03 · answer #6 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 10 1

you do realize that neandertals had a larger cranial capacity than us and likely would have been a superior species to us had they not become extinct.

2007-10-18 13:57:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Here's a link for you, read and learn:

2007-10-18 13:55:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I wonder if evil lotion burns...or what about the lotion makes it evil? Does it choose to be evil or was it made to be evil...himm.

2007-10-18 13:59:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

hey! I used to date that guy!

2007-10-18 13:54:37 · answer #10 · answered by mariposa 3 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers