Why do democrats want us to lose the war in Iraq by introducing gays into the military?

Question

This is got to be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. Our enemies would just laugh at us if this happened. We need to end up victorious in iraq and repealing the don't ask don't tell law is not the way to do it, in fact we need to ban homosexuals outright.

Answer 1

I'm sorry Mr SelfRighteous, gays have been serving in the military for decades!!

Israel has had open gays in their military for years, without any dire consequences.
You must be afraid that if you come in contact with a gay, your secret desires will overtake you and you will come out of your own closet!

me=NOT Gay and not afraid of them either

Answer 2

haha...there has been, and still are gays in the military. I'm not a big fan of the lifestyle but I think they are just as competent as any other person.

I'm not sue why you would think introducing gays into the military would cost us the war. I think the idiots in congress, the senate an the armed forces policy council are costing us the war in Iraq.

This can't be a serious question I think you are just trying to incite a riot....

Answer 3

Don't ask, Don't tell, instituted by the liberal god President William Jefferson Clinton, is intended to keep a person's sexual status from becoming an issue when in the military.

This works well for both sides. On the gay side, it keeps gays from being discriminated against or ostricized by their fellow soldiers. On the anti-gay marriage side, it keeps the lifestyle from being expressed around those who are offended by it. In all matters, it helps keep the various military units UNITED. When you're in the military, you don't belong to yourself anymore. You belong to Uncle Sam, and to your fellows. You're supposed to all be part of a whole person.

Sexual orientation/gay rights is a dividing issue. Kudos to Clinton for having the wisdom to keep this issue OUT of the military.

Edit: Pobept,
It's not about gays being "unfit" for military service. The gay issue in this country is a deeply personal, divisive issue. We cannot afford for that kind of division to seep into the ranks of the military. That is why Clinton enacted the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. It doesn't keep gays from serving. It just keeps sexual orientation from becoming an issue.

Edit 2: Troy, I have read, and in those days, it was largely a cultural thing. Otherwise straight men would humiliate their opponents by performing sexual acts on them after their defeat. It was a way to show power and dominence. It by no means indicated their sexual preference.

Answer 4

How does someone's sexual proclivity affect his (or her) ability to serve in the military? And why do you assume Democrats want us to 'lose the war in Iraq by introducing gays into the military'? Where's your documentation for such charges? Or is it simply your own personal hatred, prejudice, cowardism, bias and bigotry that makes you believe such garbage?
Assuming you're not gay and you're not in the military, why aren't you serving your country by fighting in Iraq? If you're so pro-war and anti-gay, why aren't you over there risking your life??

Answer 5

they do no longer -- no longer outright, it is. the famous baby-kisser speaks by way of a type of a million/2-truths, ambivalences, and fluff in which one might (even though it relatively is not going) discover substance might desire to one make the attempt to penetrate all of it. greater than a number of the undesirable one hears approximately Iraq is one, the different, or all 3 of those -- although in a contest, a million/2-truths could win palms down for that reason. And in case you relatively pay interest, they do no longer prefer to lose the conflict -- yet they do no longer truly prefer to win, the two. See, to a toddler-kisser, a conflict is little better than a reason for political progression; the morals, motives, and outcomes are in basic terms a great style of cumbersome information to paintings by way of. If President Bush have been to announce a directly withdrawal to be accomplished by skill of this time next week, human beings could be up in hands -- in relation to the liberal politicians, for all of the incorrect motives. Bush-bashing has grow to be an magnificent gadget for garnering political help between the louder, greater extreme left-wing; the Iraq conflict is, as verified so aptly by skill of our national media, their prevalent source of ammunition. eliminate that from the equation, and we all quickly discover ourselves handling such petty squabbles because of the fact the commutation of a sentence or the firing of numerous attorneys -- on none of which you will base a political platform. Assuming a Democrat of the at the instant-working ilk is elected to the Presidency, you could relax certain that the Iraq conflict won't end for a solid long term because of the fact it relatively is going to nonetheless be politically expedient accountable each and everything on George Bush for numerous years after he's long gone. no longer in basic terms will this strengthen the recent President's political status (yet in basic terms between the extreme communities to whom he or she is at the instant pandering), even though it relatively is going to additionally absolve her or him of any duty for any mess ups which happen in the process the recent Presidential term. it relatively is all in a superb, noticeably little container, isn't it?

Answer 6

You think Iraq has no gays? Think again.

You think the U.S. military has no gays, think agian; they have been doing the same job as "straight" types for hundreds of years, or did you think Gay was new?

Iraq is a lost cause. No military action will briung democracy to that state as it is too divided.

If being hetero sexual makes for a better military candidate please tell us all why?

Answer 7

the united states and Turkey are the only countries in the world that find gay's unfit for military service. Whether you like it or not 5 plus % ARE gay, they are there, just not openly. I served 20 years, I'm Bi-sexual, I have win just about every medal the army has to offer, including the bronze star for heroism.
So, don't try to blame any problems the military has on gay soldiers.

Answer 8

B-WAH?? I don't think the people we are bombing would really care what our soldiers like to rub their woo-hoo on, they would be more concerned about not getting blown up.
Are you really so good looking that you're afraid a gay guy will just jump right on you? Get over yourself. If you are not gay, why would a gay guy be interested in you?

Answer 9

Your screen name says it all. I'll bet you never served in combat? When one is in a fire fight, you do not care what religion, race, nor the sexual preference is of the person along side of you. All you care about is them doing their job and you doing yours. Otherwise, you are both DEAD.

Answer 10

Come On, Gay Men are still Men, and in war they will fight and serve their country as men. In fact, Historically homosexuality begins in the Military.