2007-10-18 05:46:16 · 9 answers · asked by curious 1 in Food & Drink ➔ Other - Food & Drink
There are fewer calories in the lite (compared to non-diet soda anyway).
There are fewer chemicals in the Lite than soda.
High fructose corn syrup used to sweeten non-diet sodas, and most of the artificial sweeteners in diet sodas are believed to increase risks of cancer and other health issues.
Beer does contain alcohol, however, which can have some health issues as well, besides imnpaired judgement, alcohol can be damaging to the liver (in excess) and perhaps increase risk of certain cancers.
I think I'd pick the Lite...
2007-10-18 06:10:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miller Lite
2007-10-18 05:49:40 · answer #2 · answered by Doodles 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miller Lite.
2007-10-18 05:55:14 · answer #3 · answered by crisdeee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Beer is definatley better for you than soda. It won't rot your teeth and it makes you feel good. Its safer to drink then water even, due to the boiling and alcohol which sanitizes the beer, so to speak. But I would hope to have a better beer then Lite. How about a Lagunitas IPA?
2007-10-18 05:51:46 · answer #4 · answered by eddie s. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miller Lite,it has barley in it.
2007-10-18 06:54:43 · answer #5 · answered by Candi Apples 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
miller lite
2007-10-18 05:51:00 · answer #6 · answered by coach 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
soda if i had to choose between soda and miller lite. Now is it was between soda and shiner bock or pyramid heff then i would choose beer.
2007-10-18 05:53:34 · answer #7 · answered by Kristi S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
when was the last time you heard about someone dying under the influence of soda?
2007-10-18 05:54:31 · answer #8 · answered by csoup70 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
bud light or corona
2007-10-18 05:50:53 · answer #9 · answered by big Sco 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋