English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Prominent creation scientist Em Adjineri has proposed an alternative to atomic theory called "Intelligent Subatomism" or IS. IS is a better theory and should be taught in schools.

IS says that atoms are made of three types of particles: positively charged Godons, negatively charged Satons, and neutral humons. Godons collect in the nucleus of the atom and are joined by humons, who wish to become divine like the Godons.

Satons used to be allowed in the nucleus but were banished because the Electron of Light (Luciton) tried to take over the nucleus. The Godons banded together and created the Strong (Divine) Nuclear force which keeps all the Godons and Humons together in the nucleus.

IS is better than Atomic Theory because atomic theory doesn't explain why particles have charge. According to IS, particles have charges because they use free will to accept or reject the positive charge that God offers.

Does anybody else think IS should be taught as an alternative to Atomic Theory?

2007-10-18 05:39:29 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

7 answers

LOL. And what about those crazy particles called heathons, the very confused morons, and the wacky oxymorons.

Thanks for the laughs.

2007-10-18 05:48:01 · answer #1 · answered by kwxilvr 4 · 5 0

It could be taught alongside the Theory of Intelligent Falling.

2007-10-18 05:42:38 · answer #2 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 5 0

Dr. Adjineri strikes again! Another brilliant revision of fact to suit religious needs! God Bless You!

2007-10-18 05:44:02 · answer #3 · answered by average person Violated 4 · 4 0

advent technological expertise is an oxymoron. you won't be able to call your self a scientist and carry to a faith. both issues conflict with one yet another because you're explaining the existance of something and to top all of it off - God created it. Wtf? you won't be able to have it both strategies. maximum of those "advent scientists" likely adhere to Pascal's wager. They comprehend the reality, yet they are terrified of the outcomes contained in the afterlife. that is idiotic.

2016-10-21 09:04:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Anything is better than 'toe'

2007-10-18 05:53:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

how about 'subintelligent atomism' ?

2007-10-18 05:50:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

HOW ABOUT NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-10-18 05:42:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers