Who would support a Constitutional amendment prohibiting the teaching of Intelligent Design and Creationism...

Question

in public school science classes?

Answer 1

If science classes were left up to the scientists, we would have no problems.

Answer 2

I would not want the Constitution used for this end. The day Creationism/ID makes a testable prediction that can be falsified, but ISN'T, I would be for teaching it alongside evolution. Until then, I believe there should be no legislation regarding what should or should not be taught. The process we have now works. We do not need to stoop to the level of Creationists by circumventing the system through forced legislation.

Answer 3

The mathematician Leibnitz as quickly as wrote (and forgive me if I butcher the Latin) "Sum Deus calculat, mundus pundit" which skill, "As God calculates, so the Earth turns". i would not be so speedy to push aside smart layout, however the undertaking with that's that that's being taught interior the incorrect place. smart layout isn't a technological understanding; that's greater of a philosophy. In technological understanding, you will circulate out and examine out hypothesis with experiements and observations. subsequently, you will circulate to the Galapagos Islands and spot how creatures evolve, and if one has time ought to establish experiments. although, how does one try God? possibly that's authentic that the clarification that a proton and an electron charm to a minimum of one yet another (or the different organic phenomenon) is via the fact this became into the grand scheme of issues for the Almighty, whether that's God, Allah, Yahweh, Zeus, the stress, or Joe. although, this would not seem a scientific attitude. returned, that's greater of a philosophical "who're we? the place did we come from?" sort of question. as far via fact the Constitutionality of smart layout, i think of you're over-reacting a lot. at the start, in case you desire to quote Constitutionality, the 10th exchange reserves all powers no longer especially granted to the federal government to the States. hence, via fact that training isn't reported interior the form, the federal government extremely has no enterprise addressing this question. it would be left to State and local authority.

Answer 4

Intelligent design it not taught in public school now why would an amendment be passed prohibiting the teaching of something that is not being taught?

Answer 5

All it would do is further alienate those states with less experience at being in the United States.

It's time to rethink allowing them to be in the Land of the Free. The only reasons we don't seriously think about secession is fear of changing the status-quo and the absolute knowledge that the South and Midwest would become the third world the second the Northeast and West cut their disaster funding.

Answer 6

There is no need to mess around with our Constitution.

The Constitution - and several amendments - already protect everyone's religious rights. Separation of church and state is firmly supported by them.

The debate will rage on, of course, by those who think that everyone must agree absolutely with them and we who don't agree are all going to hell to burn for eternity.

There are people on this earth who have no interest in truth, science or anything else. They will cling to their own point of view in the face of facts forever.

Best thing is to ignore them....they won't ever go away but by ignoring them, they won't have a platform to try and enforce their fairy tales.

Answer 7

I am so glad to see you, there were some deletions yesterday.

I think I would, yes, until there is proof for intelligent design, even though I do believe in it.

Facts should be taught in science and evolution is fact.

Answer 8

The Constitution already HAS a prohibition like that. It's called the First Amendment.

Answer 9

Sorry, this doesn't warrant a Constitutional amendment - just apply common sense, and the separation of church and state.

Amendments should be reserved for HUGE issues to ensure that all citizens receive equal rights.

If people want such subjects to be taught, they should be part of a comparative religion course, or part of a discussion of what is [and isn't] the 'scientific method.'

Answer 10

No The Constitution is too important to contain such nonsense. We have sufficient law already to prevent the teaching of such religious crap in public schools.