We need matter in order for things to excite. Matter is substance: that which has mass and occupies space; "an atom is the smallest indivisible unit of matter"
Scientist say that the "BIG BANG" came from nothing... how could everything be create if there was nothing... no substance??? It’s impossible.
I believe there was always something, and i believe God is time. Time has no beginning or an End, Time travels in light, God is light. God always was there and it will always excite. Without light there would be no life. Even in the bible tells us that God is light, scientist tells us that we need light for there to be life. God is the giver of life. Therefore he is time and light.
2007-10-18 05:03:08 · 29 answers · asked by canadianmounty007 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
http://www.big-bang-theory.com/ - The big bang theory - everything came from nothing okay... sure....
2007-10-18 05:16:52 · update #1
"Prior to that moment there was nothing; during and after that moment there was something: our universe." -
http://www.big-bang-theory.com/
???? okay anyone????
2007-10-18 05:19:21 · update #2
If you said that im wrong that scientist say that everything came from nothing, then study and read your theory before you come here and tell me that i haven't study it.
2007-10-18 05:21:57 · update #3
There Is THE GOD, Who IS and no one can change that!
God Is and He loves us so much!!
It is written In His Words that 1 day for Him is like 1.000 days and 1.000 days is like 1 day. He controls everything. Men cannot understand The Thoughts of God!
2007-10-18 05:11:18 · answer #1 · answered by Desir D 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
We do not need matter to excite things. Energy will do. The atom is not the smallest indivisible unit. We have Protons neutrons and electrons below that, and quarks below those. We will have to see what, if anything, quarks are made of.
Scientist do not say the big bang came from nothing. They just do not know what caused it. M-Theory or string theory is looking good as an explanation. We will have to see how experiments support it.
You can believe whatever you want. It does not make it real. Time is deemed to have started at the moment of the big bang. Before that time was fairly meaningless. Outside the universe time id fairly meaningless and just become another dimension.
You have an incredibly poor understanding of science. I hope that you are going to educate yourself better before posting stuff like this again.
2007-10-18 12:13:45 · answer #2 · answered by Simon T 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For one, matter is also energy. You can have pure energy, and have it turn into matter, and vise versa. Also, there are things smaller then an atom. Like the things an atom is made out of. Also, time can have a beginning. Before the universe was present, theorietically there wasn't time. Time is the 4th dimension, and needs a universe to exist. Before the universe, there wasn't time. And the Big Bang Theory doesn't say all the matter came from nothing. There are several hypothesises on what and where the matter/universe way before the Big Bang. All the Big Bang says is that a super condensed point of matter expanded rapidly to "create" the universe.
2007-10-18 12:10:46 · answer #3 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
"is there a God?" Maybe.
"Scientist say that the "BIG BANG" came from nothing" No they don't.
"I believe..." And?
--
I would say your understanding of the website is extremely flawed. It points out the problem with reading the surface of something with no attempt to understand the meaning.
Even though the author says "Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know. "
Notice the author said "come from" & "we "don't know"
You ignored that and ran to, " Prior to the singularity, nothing existed, not space, time, matter, or energy - nothing."
This is something stated in every classroom that deals with this. And if the professor is at all competent will also explain that what this means is that for the sake of math and physics truly nothing did exist. All cosmological calculations are based upon the known physical laws of the current universe. Before the expansion began those laws did not exist because this universe as we know it did not exist. Thus you can't calculate anything before the expansion began so from a mathematical and physics standpoint nothing existed.
But as far as "COME FROM" is concerned they said they don't know. The link you provided is adequate proof that you are wrong.
I will give scientists half the blame for assuming everyone has a basic understanding of math and physics.
----
If misconceptions were converted into energy the human race would destroy the universe/
2007-10-18 12:07:16 · answer #4 · answered by Demetri w 4 · 7⤊ 1⤋
No, scientists do not say that the "Big Bang" came from nothing. The Big Bang was not an explosion, it was an expansion. Look up the theory and actually read it.
I realize I'm asking a lot, but it's a good idea to actually learn something about science before dismissing it.
The rest of your "question" is a preaching rant, and not very convinving.
2007-10-18 12:12:43 · answer #5 · answered by Scott M 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You would be interested in William Day's book, The New Physics, on how matter propagated from photons.
But, god as time? Since the only aspect of time that is eternally present is the NOW, it is doubtful that time even exists outside of human 'perception.' God/Reality is the non-material quantum field which is responsive to consciousness, as a result of our evolving massive thinking brain. Our measurable EM field affects matter at a distance including our own reactive electrochemistry and thought system. Reality mirrors the contents of consciousness thus we are creators of experience individually and en masse.
2007-10-18 12:15:20 · answer #6 · answered by MysticMaze 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No science doesn't say that it came from nothing. M Theory says it came from a collision in the underlying framework of other universes. The matter was always here, just in a different form.
The only group that makes that claim are the ones that say God made it from nothing. Glad you agree that is silly.
2007-10-18 12:11:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I want to know what pastor/pastors are standing on the pulpit saying "scientists say the Big Bang came from nothing!" I have yet to see this quote come from a scientist, yet it is propagated by theists on here on a daily basis. Where did this come from? SOMEONE PROVIDE THE LINK!!!!!!
Edit: Your link is Big-Bang-Theory.com? Who runs that website? Where are its sources? Where is the citation quoting scientists as saying the Big Bang came from nothing? Holy Hell!
2007-10-18 12:09:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
You believe that a God always existed.
I believe that matter/energy always existed.
You claim that matter must have been created because of its existence, but don't apply the same logic to your God for mysterious reasons.
We all know matter exists, God on the otherhand only exists in the heart, or mind, or in stories, there is nothing tangible about any of the thousands of Gods that we have attributed matter to thoughout the ages.
Why does matter require a creation?
2007-10-18 12:08:11 · answer #9 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
time is a description to distinguish the difference from one instantaneous moment from another. it's not an actual being, but merely a concept.
secondly light comes from the sun
2007-10-18 12:13:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ScientistS do not say "the 'BIG BANG' came from nothing."
your dishonesty (deliberate or not) undermines your point.
your bible demonstrates that the Christian god is not time, as he is within time and reacts/shows emotion in response to certain events. therefore your hypothesis does not fit your bible.
2007-10-18 12:10:23 · answer #11 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋