The Big Bang?

Question

I just want to tal about the Big Bang -- nothing else. Why is it that even though there is a LAW against planets forming from gas, dust, and whatever -- Boyle’s law (Gas clouds dissipate outward ) -- people stil believe in Evolution? And another thing if the creation of the universe was random, chaotic, and unpredictable, modern scientific investigation could never have been developed.

PS -- I'm posting this in here since I know there r so many Atheists that r trying 2 find God... that was sarcasm 4 those of u who don't know.

Answer 1

I agree that evolution make,s no sense and it explain,s
nothing, why is it so hard to believe God created it all
Satan can blind so many and has done a good job with
this one.

Answer 2

You are misunderstanding the whole thing. According to Boyles law Gases fill the available space. That is only because gases exist in an atmosphere where air movement allows the gas to move in order to comply with the law.

Take space. It is empty. There is no air to help movement. Gas is also subject to gravity. It has weight and so too does any other material within that gas. Thus gas and dust are attracted to one another through gravity and through simple collisions mediated through their movement with one another. Our atmosphere is held in place by gravity. That is why we breath air. That is why we have an atmosphere.

Your logic about the random, chaotic universe simply doesn't hold up. The beginning was chaotic but there was rapid cooling after the big bang and elements were formed and a certain order was brought about as planets formed and gravity began to influence their movement. Modern scientific investigation is independent of this chaos at the beginning and has taken place only because relative order was produced. Are you saying that the earth is unordered and incapable of producing humans who think and reason? This clearly isn't true. Out of chaos came a sort of order. We developed in a relatively orderly environment.

Answer 3

Oh, lawdy...

Look, has it not occurred to you that others might have considered Boyle when modelling protosolar clouds? Do you think they just pretended it wasn't there?

Or could there be some attractive force that overwhelms the natural repulsion of gas molecules? Something like... gravity?

Because although it's a small force for individual particles, a great light-years-wide mass would exert quite a bit of overall self-attraction, wouldn't it?

Ah, this is boring. Anyone arrogant enough to think that their mediocre understanding can trump hundreds of years of cosmology and cosmogony is too thick to bother with.

CD

Answer 4

Hogwash. There are physicals LAWS that explain the formation of planets. Trying to say that Boyle's law is against it is really, really stupid.

I just LOVE it when someone like you, who actually believes in a literal talking donkey, and that grass grew and reproduced before the sun existed, and that the earth stopped rotating for a few hours one day, tries to appeal to science.

You are a lying hypocrite.

Answer 5

Maybe you should study a bit further and discover the wonderful new theory about gravity and other Physic concepts. (heavy sarcasm).

Note: Trying to apply Boyle's law to planet formation is like a second grader, with no chemistry knowledge, trying to correct the formula for a complex peptide.

Answer 6

Boyle's law has nothing to do with it. Gravitational pull causes the gas clouds to combine. The gravitational pull is so weak on a small scale that is has no effect on the gasses you see on earht. This has nothing to do with evolution either.
The second point makes even less sense.

Answer 7

I think you're referring to the LAW against the Big Gang Bang, right?

Answer 8

Are you saying that Boyle's law applies to gas in a vaccuum?

Answer 9

I am a deist.

I think God was the Big Bang. NOT the biblical monster.

Answer 10

The Big Bang has little to do with evolution.