http://digg.com/offbeat_news/Tasered_Shot_With_Bean_Bag_Rounds_For_Filming_Warrantless_Police_Search
Since cameras are such dangerous weapons, don't we need to take them off of the streets?
2007-10-18 03:23:24 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
That is a pretty good example of police brutality. I hope the police involved are sent to jail for assault and I hope the guy sues the police department and gets a big settlement. I also hope that all other police officers are required to get training every year that reminds them when they can use force and what they can order people to do or not do.
2007-10-18 03:32:23 · answer #1 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Obama, if elected, will probably get to nominate 2 Judges to the suited court docket. Is there any doubt as to how destiny Obama appointed judges could have voted in the recent District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. ___ (2008) case? It grew to become right into a 5 to 4 determination and you are going to be certain that ANY Democrat appointed decide would be balloting to restrict gun possession for regulation abiding voters. The liberal judges ALL voted to restrict man or woman gun possession. On June 26, 2008, by skill of a 5 to 4 determination, the suited court docket upheld a federal appeals court docket ruling, remarkable down the D.C. gun regulation. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for many folk, reported, "In sum, we carry that the District's ban on handgun possession in the residing house violates the 2nd modification, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the residing house operable for the purpose of instantaneous self-protection ... We verify the judgment of the court docket of Appeals" each and every of the liberal judges voted by contrast. ANY destiny Obama judges will vote by contrast. "Ban" could be too solid of a be conscious, yet Obama will truly make it greater durable for the regulation abiding to get weapons. The criminals of path will haven't any situation getting weapons as familiar. by skill of ways, muder quotes are decrease in numerous countries that have common gun possession. Switzerland includes strategies. Israel additionally has greater weapons in line with capita than the u . s . a ., and if terrorism is taken out of the figures, gun violence is plenty below in the u . s . a ..
2016-10-13 01:43:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, of course. As long as we are allowed to own cameras, the government cannot impose complete tyranny. We must ban and confiscate all privately owned video cameras immediately, so that our government can end all of this silly "freedom" nonsense that we cling to.
^^ sarcasm, for those who don't catch it...
2007-10-18 03:39:21 · answer #3 · answered by wendit80 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that is freaking crazy!!! he was nowhere near the police officers, he was not interfearing... anything in the public has the right to be taped, taken pics of etc... i dont totally agree with that, such as used to film wrecks, and showing the pts in the wreck, but what he was doing was not illegal... i would def sue!!!
2007-10-18 21:17:54 · answer #4 · answered by firechick1721 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ban video cameras and let crooked cops get away with murder? Ban video cameras and lose security serveilance of your property or business? Ban video cameras and lose all forms of amatuer porn? No way........
Video cameras are here to stay.
2007-10-18 03:33:16 · answer #5 · answered by theCATALYST 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A slightly Orwellian question. The truth is Big Brother is watching us all.
2007-10-18 03:32:34 · answer #6 · answered by Kingdiana Jones 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they shouldn't be banned. It is only what can be done with them that is the problem and not everybody out in society wants to invade your privacy.
2007-10-18 03:27:21 · answer #7 · answered by panda 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
video cameras are dangerous weapons?? ok!
2007-10-18 03:36:28 · answer #8 · answered by CHELLE 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, citizens should be able to own video camaras whats next no personal computers??
2007-10-18 03:29:17 · answer #9 · answered by Looking for the REAL answer! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, thats the silliest thing I have ever heard.
2007-10-18 03:28:37 · answer #10 · answered by howie r 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋