The first people to invade a country should be the children of the legislators who voted for it, and of the ones who will get mega rich from the contracts and the booty to be had after the invasion. In other works, you want to invade? You go first. Or your kids.
2007-10-18 03:59:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stubblejumper 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush's eyes are purple from the tears shed for the purple of the soldier's and marine's blood that has been shed struggling with sworn enemies of the U.S. also they are purple with anger for the Democrats and media who've always attacked him because January 2001. He in basic terms did what each and every of the individuals Buzzy quoted did no longer have the middle to do. What he did mandatory to be performed. imagine of each and every of the worry attacks contained in the international, plenty adversarial to the US, that got here about before and on 11th of September, 2001 that would were the starting up of a targeted warfare on terrorism it really is now being fought because of George Bush. imagine for a second, what number civilian usa voters who've been killed by technique of terrorists because the invasion of Iraq? what number before? i imagine the numbers are overwhelmingly contained in the before type. George Bush is a man or woman doing what he believes is ideal. So, do you no longer imagine that he mourns for those useless human beings in Iraq and Afghanistan? he's a non secular guy and mourns the death of all of us. you've the right to precise your evaluations, yet make sure they are in basic terms that, evaluations and do not attempt to state them as truth. in case you opt for to criticize the Iraq warfare, criticize the Iraqi authorities which won't be able to and could no longer settle for duty for the safe practices of their very personal usa. Blame Al Qaeda it really is committed to killing all and multiple who receives contained in the way of their agenda it really is the Jihadists ruling the international. do not blame George Bush. Blame the cowardly those who use women individuals and toddlers to do their artwork of death, yet do not blame George Bush. Blame the individuals who use automobile bombs on busy streets that kill innocuous civilians, yet do not blame George Bush. Blame the cowards who bomb and hide like the cowards they are, yet do not blame George Bush. Blame those who spew hate because of their celeb status can get them media time, yet do not blame George Bush. Blame those that make anti-American video clips that do not do any strong for the moral of our struggling with troops, yet do not blame George Bush. i might want to pass on and on, yet that is sufficient. If i have not gotten my factor for the era of by technique of now, I by no skill will.
2016-10-21 08:53:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Soldiers are pawns in the wealthy man's pursuit of riches.
------------------------------------------------
WAR IS A RACKET
BY MAJOR-GENERAL SMEDLEY BUTLER
War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the many.
I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we'll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.
I wouldn't go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
There isn't a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to plan war preparations, and a "Big Boss" Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.
It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.
I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
2007-10-18 02:59:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Trevor S 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
He started the war for oil,
I will let someone else answer the color of blood part.
2007-10-18 03:42:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Good answer Trevor S. My dad was in world war 2 and told me many of these same truths, military brainwashes soldiers for the benefits of the rich and powerful.
2007-10-18 03:19:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ktcyan 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Black like oil.
2007-10-18 02:58:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bonnie 4
·
2⤊
5⤋
In Bush's mind, everything is oil related.
2007-10-18 02:57:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lenny L 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
I love Bush and I love what he is doing for this country. I don't know if anyone has realized yet but our soldiers have not been selected upon random civilians.... they inlist because they want to serve their country. The majority are glad they are.
2007-10-18 02:58:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lauren Ryann 2
·
5⤊
5⤋
If Bush sees black instead of red i think he is either blind or immoral.
2007-10-18 03:14:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
I bet he has one of those towers like in Duck Tales and he swims in oil instead of gold.
2007-10-18 02:58:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Iczer 4
·
1⤊
5⤋