English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Here is one part, taken from the state website:

66260.7. "Gender" means sex, and includes a person's gender
identity and gender related appearance and behavior whether or not
stereotypically associated with the person's assigned sex at birth.

If I read that right, a 15 year old boy could decide he is a 15 year old girl and not be discriminated against just because of his plumbing. So what's to stop him from demanding to go to girl's gym, shower with the girls, hang out in the stalls of the girls' bathroom?

Wake up America, what happens in California soon spreads East! I'm asking this in a few different areas just to get a balanced response. Thank you.

2007-10-18 02:29:02 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Sorry, mistype, meant SB777

2007-10-18 04:32:14 · update #1

Luci and others, I'm not saying it will happen in every school, but let's say it does in 3 or 4 out of the thousands and the boy has a camera phone. You want your daughters on the internet?

2007-10-18 04:35:37 · update #2

19 answers

I don't care.

2007-10-18 02:32:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

You are 100% Correct it is taking the form of Federal Law and has circumvented Free Speech and Civil Rights except for an Elite Few! You read that correctly and that is what Enda and Hr Bills 254,984, 1592 and 2015 is all about. There will be no male or female as we once knew it. It is styled after EC Laws already in Place and enforced in Europe and Cananda. Anything else is Considered a Hate Crime.

Where is the Mainstream Media? HR 2015 was attached to the Defense Bill, last week!

2007-10-18 02:41:32 · answer #2 · answered by Stormchaser 5 · 0 1

Gender Identity is not a choice, for one thing. It's the result of both genetics and societal conditioning.

A 15 year old boy can't just decide he's a 15 year old girl. I assume that before a school allows a transgendered male into the women's locker room they would have the individual undergo a psychiatric evaluation to determine whether or not using the women's locker room would be advisable.

A 15 year old isn't just going to decide he wants to pretend to be transgendered so he can sneak into the girls locker room. Even if he does, he likely won't be successful.

2007-10-18 02:38:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I would think that if a 15 yr. old boy felt he was truly a girl, using the girl's restroom and shower would be the least of his concerns. Also, school districts can set their own rules about how to define that.
Why is it such a big deal to you? I've shared many a restroom with drag queens and transgender adults and I can assure you the last thing they are interested in is me.

2007-10-18 02:34:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Oh my gosh, st.aliao, I did too and I never thought about it either until now. I actually forgot that I did. It did not feel akward for me and I did not feel like they were looking at me. They were putting on their lipstick and adjusting their stockings. Angry: I understand your concerned about a boy pretending he wants to change his sex so he can look at the girls in the locker room. But do you really think a hetrosexual boy would do that? If he really wasn't that way.

2007-10-18 02:51:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Uh, I think you mean SB777---AB777 is about elephants.

Anyway, If you actually read the whole bill, you'd realize that they define "gender" (which, by the way, is the ACTUAL DEFINITION of the word) for the same reasons they define "disability," "race," "nationality," and all the other things you're not supposed to be discriminated against because of---because ALL bills provide definitions of key terms within them.

SB777 is about anti-discrimination. Your question is misleading in that it implies the purpose of the bill is to re-define gender, when in actuality it's just giving the standard, accepted definition of the word, to provide background for people who don't know what "gender" means.

2007-10-18 02:43:45 · answer #6 · answered by Sarah 3 · 1 1

BILL NUMBER: AB 777 INTRODUCED BILL TEXT
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Levine
FEBRUARY 22, 2007

An act to amend Section 596.5 of the Penal Code, relating to animal cruelty.

AB 777, as introduced, Levine. Animal cruelty: elephants.
Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for an owner or manager of an elephant to abuse an elephant, as specified. This bill would prohibit specified conduct in relation to housing, possessing, contacting, or traveling with, an elephant and would require a person or entity who possesses, keeps, or maintains an elephant at a stationary facility to meet certain conditions at the facility, as specified. This bill would also subject any person or entity who engages in the prohibited conduct or who fails to meet the specified conditions to misdemeanor penalties. Because this bill would create new crimes, it would impose a state-mandated local program.


the truth shall set you free pal....

2007-10-18 02:41:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Thats what it sounds like. Can I change my gender identity from day to day? If I was a girl (by birth) then I would change just so I wouldnt have to wait in line at the bathroom!

Usually the Southeast doesnt adopt these wacky ideas proposed by the libs in California. However the Northeast tends to see the "light" of the liberal tunnel and follows blindly.

Unfortunately, Im in Florida so it depends on voter turnout. We swing from lib to conserv.

2007-10-18 02:37:49 · answer #8 · answered by MrMyers 5 · 1 3

Yea, someone told me that 'Ah-nold' passed a law saying they can't use the word 'parent' anymore, it has to be 'guardian'. Maybe that is in the same law? Strange stuff in California. But I always thought most of them were a little strange anyway.

2007-10-18 02:35:20 · answer #9 · answered by witnessnbr1 4 · 2 2

The law's unnecessary. If a guy wants to be a girl (*shudder*) then he can get a sex-change.

2007-10-18 02:34:41 · answer #10 · answered by Skunk 6 · 2 0

am i surprised?
nope this world is vile and wicked

sin is allowed everywhere.

Ill stand for Jesus and hopefully be able to see some saved from hell

2007-10-18 02:40:02 · answer #11 · answered by jesussaves 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers