You republicans are always talking about illegal immigration. Every time I turn around, a poll is showing Giuliani increasing in popularity. He is the strongest PRO illegal immigration in the race on both sides. He advocates and verbalizes his support openly. He created a Safe Haven for illegals in NYC, which he still defends. Not only that, New York is about to give licenses to illegals. One republican is being badgered for opposing it. Guess who is against the republican, not Hitlery?
You all verbalize being against something then support a liberal minded Giuliani. Killary, I mean Hillary, is a better candidate because she has enough sense to know that she has to deal with the American public. Thank God, I went Independent! You democrats and republicans are pathetic. Giuliani and Killary are politically schzophrenics. There is not a good candidate out there, except Obama. I think he is committed to fixing our borders, so I am voting for him.
2007-10-17 21:40:06 · 6 answers · asked by shawnLacey 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I want Obama to be mah baby daddy!
2007-10-18 05:45:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be honest I don't think the people are the ones choosing the candidates anymore and we haven't for a long time.
Most people are content backing the candidate they are told is ahead in the polls for their party and just follow them blindly (how else do you explain Bush's re-election?)
How often are we going to hear "I don't like Guliani, but at least he's better then Hillary?" or vice versa?
HOW? How are they any different from each other?
None of the "front runners" are in strong opposition to illegal immigration. None of the front runners are opposed to free trade. None of the front runners are opposed to the NAU either.
How does a candidate get to be a front runner? Well they become a front runner by raising allot of money really fast. Then people start following the front runners blindly.
This is pretty much a system designed to elect a president that has sold out to lobbyists and the more lobbyist the better.
2007-10-18 07:08:54 · answer #2 · answered by Drixnot 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1 in 5 Republicans choose 'none of the above'. I'm one of them. A similar number of Democrats are in the same place.
Obama is a globalist and has no interest that I have EVER seen in even denting illegal immigration, but I would be happy to be convinced otherwise.
Do you have any evidence of that whatsomever?
2007-10-18 09:06:18 · answer #3 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
his forefathers brought the sicilian mafia to shore and introduced spaghetti to usa.
if he were elected then all secret service will be replaced by blackwater.
the only difference between blackwater and the mafia is its legal and above the law.... shoot on sight any women men children and dogs for that matter.... that could clear the reservists, immigration patrol etc from prosecution in manning the borders....
giuliani my son.... pass the spagetti mozarella... kapic!
2007-10-18 04:53:56 · answer #4 · answered by Mongol 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
San Fransisco is giving them to illegals too. What is your point...
Just feel like starting some drama
2007-10-18 04:43:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, he's a figment of your imagination.
2007-10-18 06:00:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋