Being an artist is 99% of the way there. But you need a fairly good camera to capture your artistic streak.
2007-10-19 03:17:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Piano Man 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I use those disposable cameras, and everyone praises my photography. Meanwhile, my friend has a very expensive digital camera, and very few of her pictures come out quite right. I've always used inexpensive cameras and was urged by an art teacher to study photography, but I'd rather just have fun with it.
I tried working with a 35mm with all of the extras in the Eighties~the only time my photographs turned out blurry or not up to par. So, I went back to the cheaper stuff.
If you were going to be a professional, I imagine that cheap wouldn't work.
2007-10-17 20:23:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by MystMoonstruck 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Being a good photographer is the most important thing. A ghood photographer is what makes great images, not a camera. The camera is only the tool the photographer uses to record the image.
Some tools make it easier to get the picture, but the y don't make the image any better.
2007-10-18 01:17:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by gryphon1911 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What makes a good painting, the artist or the brush? Rembrandt could make beautiful images with a bit of stick and some feather as a brush whilst I would struggle with the finest sable brushes and expensive pigments.
The artist makes the picture, the camera is merely a recording tool.
2007-10-17 22:34:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by foggisan 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
first element: there is not any such element as a especially 'professional' digital camera, yet specialists do generally use good end DSLRs (from, say £3,000 plus extras) via fact they supply fabulous image high quality and are rugged and good. There are no DSLRs on sale in Britain for £3 hundred, yet they do commence around £350. All producers on sale in Britain are good, the best 3 are generally seen to be Nikon, Canon, and Sony. surely any DSLR provide you with a good commence in intense (and relaxing) photos. certainly any DSLR turns into greater versatile once you purchase further lenses for it. any different thank you to seem at that's a 'bridge' digital camera - that have long zoom lenses and commence around £one hundred eighty. The bodily smaller sensors in bridge cameras mean that the superb high quality of DSLRs isn't somewhat there, however the customary may well be a lot adequate for you.
2016-10-07 03:46:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The person behind the camera is the key to excellent photography. As Antoni said the camera and lens are only tools.
2007-10-17 22:21:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by EDWIN 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A good artist with a bad camera is much better than a bad artist with a good camera.
2007-10-17 20:20:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by vkrioukov 2
·
7⤊
0⤋
actually an artist is no good unless they know photography - not taking pix, but lighting and making them
those that dont know say the camera is the key, those that do know say its the photographer
i say its the fotog and the light/lighting used
a
2007-10-17 20:37:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Antoni 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
a good camera and a good photographer is required for good photography. but first of all a good camera is a must!!
2007-10-17 20:22:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by tanya 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
a camera that has good focus is important.
2007-10-17 20:20:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋