My friend is trying to figure out the name of a photographer of the 20th century whose name is something like Alfred or Albert. One of his pictures consisted of a house on the top of a tree without the use of photoshop--only a dark room.
2007-10-17 17:50:49 · 5 answers · asked by Jaclyn C 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
The house with the tree is definitely Jerry Uelsmann. He's one of my favorites. I saw him years ago at a workshop.. he actually bought in all his contraptions that he uses to make his pics. They are a bunch of cardboard things he cut out and taped together. His work is so beautiful.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Uelsmann
There are some famous Alfreds though..
Alfred Stieglitz. He's very famous. Here's a link...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Stieglitz
There's also Alfred Eisenstadt. He's responsible for one of the most well known pictures.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Eisenstadt
Hope this helps.
2007-10-17 21:46:23 · answer #1 · answered by bluekrush74 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"Thumbs Up" for Jim and blue for naming Jerry Uelsmann.
The Sept. 2007 issue of Shutterbug Magazine has an interview with him. His 'house on top of a tree' is on the cover. Also available at shutterbug.com
2007-10-17 23:10:31 · answer #2 · answered by EDWIN 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jerry Uelsmann
2007-10-17 18:25:34 · answer #3 · answered by Jim M 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What kinda photographer are you? Do you do nudes/porn in common terms or what? i can't see why females have a undertaking with you being a photographer in case you're doing it for fashions or relatively something previous shooting of bare females, or underclothes or some thing they think of could desire to be sexual. Even then, i understand i might have not any problems with it, yet i'm able to think of of females i understand who might so i assume it relies upon on the females you're dating. looks unusual that each and all and sundry the females you date have subjects with what you do although. in many situations, in case you're with a super form of persons, and it in no way works out or consistently ends badly, that's a good element to truly think of with regard to the actuality the easy denominator linking all those relationships is *you*. are you able to think of of *something* else that must be making those females have problems with you? the possibilities which you basically befell thus far ALL jealous females are rather slender, extremely. i'm able to virtually assure the undertaking isn't females's jealousy approximately what you do. possibly it relatively is the scheduling, that jumped out at me. in case you artwork loopy hours, it relatively is extremely taxing. as quickly as we are with somebody, maximum persons do no longer wanna basically have a factor-time companion, yanno? it relatively is perplexing to be with somebody who's away a lot for artwork. *extremely* perplexing. Takes an prolonged time to get used to, and that i understand for my section, if I wasn't already in love with my boyfriend, i would not have the skill to stay with him pondering how generally he's away. If I have been basically dating a guy and it wasn't too intense yet, i might bail too if he became into continuously too busy to work out me as much as i might could desire to be chuffed being his lady pal. superb success =o)
2016-10-07 03:39:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a geuss Alberto Korda
a
2007-10-17 18:15:13 · answer #5 · answered by Antoni 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋