If we evolved, then no Eden legend, no "Original Sin," no "Fall," no need for a "Redeemer."
Well, I suppose those are the theological consequences for Christianity in particular. For creationism, it simply means that the Genesis legend is not to be interpreted literally. There's no necessary objection to viewing evolution as the mechanism whereby "God" worked his magic, although God is totally superfluous to the theory itself.
2007-10-17 10:42:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Given that creationism is not, strictly speaking, theological in nature (it's cosmological), evolution poses no theological consequences.
2007-10-17 10:41:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Hoosier Daddy 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Rationality
2007-10-17 10:40:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by SteelRain 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
It demolishes the Doctrine of Biblical Literalism. Otherwise, no effect.
2007-10-17 12:08:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It means that Adam, Eve, Cain, and Able didn't exist. There was no original sin, therefor no curse of "toiling by the sweat of his brow" or "pain of bearing young" and "for dust thou art,and unto dust shalt thou return". God would not have kill animals to clothe them, hence no need for blood sacrifice. No need for blood sacrifice, no need for Jesus to be crucified.
2007-10-17 10:47:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pirate AM™ 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Creationists would have to admit that the story of Adam & Eve was allegorical, that no such "first humans" ever existed, and that their entirety of their supernatural flim flam is worthless.
2007-10-17 10:43:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Unproven theories have no consequences.
Except to those who throw away their brains and their abilty to reason to accept the lies of junk science.
Pastor Art
2007-10-17 10:44:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Nothing really. Because what were created, evolved.
2007-10-17 10:41:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋