evolution is not as near as unfake as no one would rather not say no
2007-10-17 08:31:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
nonexist isn't even a word. i can't even read that statement. so if it proves something, it would need to do so with actual words.
also, god's existence is a separate issue from evolution. at least in my view.
2007-10-17 15:36:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ye gotch yer double negitives all crossed up dare donkey.
2007-10-17 15:32:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Old guy 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
You have me on this one . I try to handle double negatives , but triple - - WOW . Doesn't not nonexist .
2007-10-17 15:35:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
of course we can prove god doesnt exist, but u guys are just closed minded who will never understand a **** about it
2007-10-17 15:32:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
absence of evidence is not the same as evidence of absence
this applies to many things
2007-10-17 15:39:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I cannot even begin to understand what you are trying to ask. You and your poor use of language have befuddled me.
2007-10-17 15:36:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by fierce beard 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Micro-evolution is real, it's been seen.
MACRO-evolution...well, let's just say that those who believe in that are just as crazy as they seem. Almost as crazy as saying there is no God, hmmm.....
Both cannot be directly proven, but God has more creditability, I assure you.
2007-10-17 15:35:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by tcjstn 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
I'm drinking on principle...
2007-10-17 15:44:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
(((HUGS))) anything is possible finding answers to the possibilities sometimes can be a pain and interesting.
2007-10-17 15:39:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ice 4
·
0⤊
1⤋