English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Agree or not agree we now that the pro immigration Liberals want to flood this Nation with Asylum seekers.

2007-10-17 04:43:44 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

23 answers

Only a fool would say it is a good idea to flood a country with foreigners that directly compete with the indigenous population for housing/health care/schooling and benefits.
To say that the English have a poor work ethic is inflammatory language and extremely insulting.
Immigrants may contribute £6bn to our economy but they cost the tax payer £8.5bn in benefits/housing/education costs/ the money they send home. Add to this the displacement of indigenous workers who claim benefits rather working and the costs triple.
When you have 5 million people unemployed in a country, you don't import a millions of workers from abroad.
If the UK population are unemployable, then we must look at the education system that allows children to leave school after 12 years unable to read, write and add up.
You change the benefits system that favours the feckless, that getting pregnant at 14 is considered a good career move for a girl.
The liberal left wingers in our schools, universities and Government have created the very problems that they are trying to solve through mass immigration.
The only people who are in favour of unlimited immigration are the people who exploit them, paying them 50p an hour to decorate their homes, look after their children, build their extensions on the cheap without paying VAT or the true cost.
Add all these costs into the equation and then say what good value immigration is.

2007-10-17 05:59:40 · answer #1 · answered by charterman 6 · 5 3

there is not any doubt they have more advantageous. yet i think of replace has been coming near slowly and progressively for various years now, even lower back to whilst Michael Atherton and Nasser Hussain have been captains. i does not call England a great team yet, yet they have been surprising. there is so plenty greater expert seem with regard to the gang now, and that i think of Andrew Flower has carried out a outstanding activity as England team director. i think of you prefer an exceedingly stable and in some strategies stressful guy to regulate a international cricket team, extremely with each and all the matters that arise now with heavy schedules (and England's is as heavy because it gets) and the IPL and so on....and Andrew Flower quite is that. the only component i in my opinion like however is they supply each and each participant a ideal danger on the utmost point till now dropping them and that i think of it rather is worked rather nicely. England have carried out nicely at residing house and in Australia yet Andrew Flower and Andrew Strauss are stable in that they shop their ft firmly on the floor and don't get too basically before themselves, taking each and each seires at a time and that i think of thats a great component for England and according to danger that has helped England to maintain convalescing. regardless of in case you seem at England's overall performance interior the UAE, confident England lost to the greater useful team, yet they weren't thoroughly outplayed, you will locate that for the period of various the matched England might basically has lost a pair of training and that value them the journey. greater importantly i think of that they confirmed some advancements alongside the way and ended up triumphing the basically ideal attempt in SL which became into great to verify. there is plenty England can do to advance, the glaring needless to say being to win interior the subcontinent. however the South African sequence coming is likewise going to be a huge attempt. i could be shocked if England whitewash Australia as Australia is a sturdy sooner or later unit, and that they have a stable captain imo. yet i desire England do nicely.

2016-10-09 10:03:28 · answer #2 · answered by huggard 4 · 0 0

i would like some one to answere this question. if a teacher, a nurse or a policeman cant afford the rents! or the house prices in London. then how come thousands of asylum seekers can afford to live there?? the structure of my question is based on the following. for the government to rent a privately owned flat in London is 'about on average'.£800.00 a to a £ 1000.00 a month. yet up north! its about £325.00 a month....so if these people are on the run and destitute i put two questions to you. no 1 why aren't they housed in the cheapest areas?...and no 2!! where are they getting the money to keep buying houses shops and businesses from? i mean first!! I'm being told you can buy half of Bulgaria for the price of a cupatea!!! next thing ya know an on! the run Bulgarian peasant turns up. claims asylum and lives in a pent house suite in London???....i just wanna know how it works cos I want some of it.

2007-10-17 06:01:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

They like being near shops for the nicking they do.Knowing full well that they can not be prosecuted succesfully.But to put the law in perspective a retailer can refuse to allow entry to anyone he chooses without reason.That should stir a few up but true.

2007-10-18 11:04:51 · answer #4 · answered by realdolby 5 · 0 1

Agree, i used to love going to London but now I would rather stay away.

2007-10-17 13:41:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Ignore the first answer.

I agree with your point, but I think you need to realise that London is not the only city affected by immigrants!!! Bradford, Manchester, Reading - all invaded! Infact, there are only a few exclusive areas within England where invasion hasn't taken place - usually nearer the country, I guess the immigrants don't want to be in farm land, they need shops & public transport to hand - what else will they spend their limitless benefit money on?

2007-10-17 04:54:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anon 4 · 5 4

I think England has always been a country of migrants whether it was immigration or emmigration.....we have invaded many different countries and claimed them as our own e.g.,commonwealth...we have ourselves have been invaded by a succession of romans,vikings, normans etc.....after the 2nd world war we welcomed many different cultures and races to our country to help us rebuild it.....look beyond a one-dimensional viewpoint....England is a multicultural society and must learn to deal with intolerance...otherwise there would be no Great in Britain

2007-10-17 05:15:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anna C 1 · 2 2

Only until the referendum on the EU, which they hope will be voted for by all the new Immigrants and thus out vote the native population. This is political engineering bigger than even Hitler thought of.

2007-10-17 06:43:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Like Patrick I wonder where they get the money to buy houses, shops and businesses from. Unless they get business loans but they have to be credit scored don't they? I don't really understand it. Oh well.

2007-10-17 06:22:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Agree

2007-10-17 04:48:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 5

fedest.com, questions and answers