English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or are "Spencerist" free market ideas and evolution completely separate spheres of activity? I mean the idea that we evolve is often opposed by those who believe in a winner take all free market economy. So it's OK to believe in "survival of the fittest" when it benefits one's pocket, but not in church or in the teaching of science.

2007-10-17 04:09:43 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

no
simply put, its called "greed"
the more you have, the more you want, there for, you business gets bigger :)

2007-10-17 04:12:32 · answer #1 · answered by FarmerCec 7 · 4 0

On the contrary, above-posted folks, this is quite an excellent question about social darwinism.

In my opinion, an excellent point. If you are poor, a free market libertarian says that you deserve lower or no access to health care and food. Imlpicitly, this person would say that wealth is a sign one has worked for survival and luxury and poverty a sign of laziness. And thus the less fit should be left to suffer and die because they did not have the discipline and wherewithall to make it.

More interesting than the fact that most of those people do seem to disbelievei n the process of evolution is the philosophical conflict between Adam Smith's predictions and Marx's observations. Smith believed humans are naturally empathetic and that this instinct toward selflessness would check unfettered greed and cause people to act kindly in a free market of their own free will. Marx argued that the free market constructs rewards and punishments that revoke our selflessness and draw out our selfishness and thus make us act like and become greedy people. In other words, the social and compassionate disposition which has served man in the past to be the fittest has been and is being modified into an individualist and greedy disposition - and thus it remains to be seen whether even the wealthy individuals at the top will in the end actually survive.

Incidentally, for someone who literally rejects the process of evolution, simply ask them what people did about wisdom teeth in the 17th century. (Answer - They did nothing, our jaws have become smaller because we no longer need the extra chewing capacity with processed foods and cooking technology so widely available. Having no room for wisdom teeth is a recent spontaneous change in human genetics.)

2007-10-17 04:28:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

State direction can concentrate economic power in a small number of hands, stagnating circulation of resources and leading to economic deterioration. In the Classical sense, "Free market" economies avoid this, because power is balanced between well-informed consumers, a variety of sellers, and in some cases some governmental limitations. Obviously, in the US for instance, where the fortune five hundred frequently hire illegal immigrants (overcoming government's limitations), credit card companies rely on fine print (keeping customers out of the loop), and food sellers use intentionally misleading labels (doing both at the same time), we're no longer talking about the "Free market" Adam Smith intended for us to think of, but instead of a directed economy, just not a state-directed economy. Therefore, what many people refer to as free markets fail to meet the actual definition, and are therefore, subject to the same inabilities as economies with an overabundance of state-planning.

2016-05-23 04:02:48 · answer #3 · answered by vonda 3 · 0 0

If we are to judge by their behavior, religion is completely utilitarian to the fabulously wealthy, so don't worry about that. Everything is smoke and lights to attract the gullible and stir up emotions so they can get support for their wars and debt schemes. Are they the fittest? Only as long as the rest of us are stupid enough to fall for their shenanigans.

2007-10-17 04:16:11 · answer #4 · answered by jaicee 6 · 0 0

That would mean the wealthy are the "most fit". You only need to live for 3 years to know that's false.

2007-10-17 04:14:18 · answer #5 · answered by Weldon 2 · 0 0

Yes, it is called Market Evolution. Books have been written on the subject.

2007-10-17 04:12:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Most freemarket fundamentalists like to think of the economics as a game of Monopoly.
They never like to think about what happens when somebody wins the game though.

2007-10-17 04:15:30 · answer #7 · answered by Y!A-FOOL 5 · 0 0

Maybe the wealth of the "fabulously wealthy" is growing, but is the number of these people increasing? I can't say it is, can you?

2007-10-17 04:14:07 · answer #8 · answered by Phil McCracken 5 · 0 0

And here, all along I thought it was "survival of the fattest".

On the other hand, maybe I was right after all.

2007-10-17 04:15:53 · answer #9 · answered by lunatic 7 · 0 0

Anything that goes forward and prospers in life is God, evolution is man made, God is divine.

2007-10-17 04:13:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers