English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The difference is profound, religiously speaking.

2007-10-17 02:02:27 · 6 answers · asked by I'm an Atheist 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

Yup. Discovering thousands of previously unknown species floating around a deep sea vent is quite different from discovering a new species of salmon that is known to have descended from a parent species within the last 70 years.

2007-10-17 02:07:06 · answer #1 · answered by Rev. Still Monkeys 6 · 1 0

Yes, but the new species of bacteria that eats hazardous waste evidently doesn't count nor do the new strains of influenza or other nasty infectious diseases.

2007-10-17 09:12:54 · answer #2 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 3 0

Yes, but since most people here can't define species, it doesn't matter.

(Hint: The word fertile offspring or its equivalent should be found in the definition.)

2007-10-17 09:11:37 · answer #3 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 3 1

Yes.

But Noah must have been one amazing collector of animals.

2007-10-17 09:08:44 · answer #4 · answered by Morey000 7 · 1 0

yes

2007-10-17 09:04:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

one was there already and one just appeared would be my guess

2007-10-17 09:12:34 · answer #6 · answered by indyskinsfan 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers