No actually they are inhabitants of Inca emperor as Inca is the first empire there in America.
2007-10-16 20:44:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
You are asking the same question, over and over and over.
The huge majority of what you are reading is THEORY. Not proven in any way.
DNA is a very very new science, which means it is in the process of evolving. Understand that what was scientifically "accepted" 200 yrs ago (or even 50 yrs ago), might be proven to be garbage today.
If you are researching your ancestry, time to stop and understand the difference between finding factual information, and debates over theoretical topics. People can help you find your gr grandfather. NO ONE can prove to you, where Native Americans were, 20,000 years ago.
You can read or hear ANYTHING you want on the internet. That has nothing to do with what is reliable or plain out science fiction.
Nothing wrong with having an interest in ancient origins or evolution. Your problem comes when you expect to "know" things that no one has an answer for, and don't know the difference.
2007-10-16 22:34:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by wendy c 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Scientific theory is that earliest Humans evolved in Africa and moved to other continents .
My guess is the Native Americans would have first moved out of what is now North Africa or Europe and then evolved in North-South America .
Of course,we still have so much to find .
And all what we have is mostly theories based on Fossils , Scientific Models .
I however not conversant with who the Navajos are .
2007-10-16 20:39:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tuvans are one of the Turkick peoples.
For those who claim peoples are caucasian, *******, or mongolian would say that Native Americans are Mongolian.
I would suggest going to such websites as from the National Geographics Genotype programs; American Natives have caucasian DNA that PREDATES COLUMBUS A N D LEIF ERIKSON!
In truth, there is no easy answer; ancient peoples moved around far more than most "scientists" and "anthropologists" are willing to admit. If you read such books as "Red Earth, White Lies", you will see that the Natives claim that whites came from the north (over the pole?). You will also see that, as they claim, it would have been impossible for them to have walked thousands of miles from Siberia to Alaska and hence to the U.S. and points south during the last Ice Age, carrying old people, babies AND SUPPLIES TO LAST FOR THOUSANDS OF MILES! There would have been no food until they reached the middle of the U.S. (north-south). No water. They would have had to build a fire to melt snow or ice for drinking. Where would they have gotten the fuel to build a fire? Without supply stations along the way, it was physically impossible for this trek to have occured. Not to mention, "scientists" claim the ice was more than a mile elevation. Alaska has the highest elevation of any state; add 1 mile or more of ice and they would have had to have oxygen masks!
The People (what the Natives called themselves) claim they came by boat; some scientists are now leaning that way.
So, what were they? From their DNA, Asian (mongoloid), polynesian, white. Mixtures of others AFTER Columbus landed...
2007-10-16 14:45:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
We Native Americans have a history on this continent going back over 30,000 years. That is long before any supposed land bridge from Asia. We were created on this continent and will always be on this continent. WE DO NOT DESCEND FROM ASIANS!!!
The Navajos have no such thing as claiming to be Mongolian, don't know where you read that, but check your references closer from now on.
2007-10-16 15:19:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Coolrogue 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
DNA wise you are right. the mongolians travelled across Alaska and populated North America. But they were also mixed with Northern Africans and europeans. Thats why some Mix asian and americans look Mexican.
2007-10-16 13:32:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bobby K 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
As a Mestizo woman, I do have Amerindian blood in me. even besides the incontrovertible fact that, when I see the term interior the census, i've got have been given self assurance like they are referring thoroughly to NORTH AMERICAN NATIVES. And as a South American woman, i do no longer experience like marking that field. i assume maximum mstizo Latinos experience the comparable way.
2017-01-03 18:46:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋