2007-10-16 08:49:47 · 20 answers · asked by Bebe 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Romans 1:20, "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world ARE CLEARLY SEEN, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; SO THAT THEY ARE WITHOUT EXCUSE".
YES!!!
2007-10-16 09:16:29 · answer #1 · answered by TruthSeeker 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If there was proof of creation then yes there would need to be a creator. The main issue for many people is that there is no proof of creation while there are many indicators of things like the big bang and evolution.
2007-10-16 16:13:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is a nut proof of a Nutter?
Creation is created by evolution, science, etc. That IS the creator.
2007-10-16 15:58:10 · answer #3 · answered by cchaos01 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither creation nor a creator exist in a religious context. If you say that either exist then you must first prove it before using it to attempt to prove the others' existence
2007-10-16 15:53:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The term "creation" implies a creator. Which is why most non-religious people don't use it. We say nature instead.
2007-10-16 15:53:10 · answer #5 · answered by meagain 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Always. But the universe is not a creation.
2007-10-16 15:52:40 · answer #6 · answered by neil s 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes but first you need to prove that the term "creation" applies.
2007-10-16 15:52:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Is Winter proof of Jack Frost?
2007-10-16 15:52:38 · answer #8 · answered by Eleventy 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
How can it's creation be explained?
2007-10-16 15:54:10 · answer #9 · answered by southfloridamullets 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on which context you're using the words in.
2007-10-16 15:58:31 · answer #10 · answered by [Rei] 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋