There's no evidence to support evolution?

Question

So the most informed scientific minds on earth are lying to me, and a man speaking with a mouth-full of 'chewin' tabackie' is more capable of relating to the subject...It all makes sense now.

Saying I have a weak mind, then prasing the lord, actually gave me a chuckle.

Praising **

Answer 1

What, you didn't know about the 150-year long international conspiracy to promote evolution through falsified evidence and spin-doctored logic? :)

Answer 2

Yeah. It's not like many species of microbes are evolving rapidly every year. And even if they did, it's not as if they're a microcosm for grander-scale organisms...

"Sarcasm is the product of a weak mind. And so is taking a ton of coincidences and calling them a theory. Praise the LORD."

Sarcasm is actually the product of an analytical mind, which is why it is lost on the blindly faithful. Hence declaring a book of man-written fables the directly translated will and testament of an elusive and unproven divine consciousness.

It's funny; you're religious, so how can you believe in coincidences?

Answer 3

How many times does man have to be so sure of a scientific theory, then later have a new theory replace it (e.g. the theory that the earth is the center of the universe)? There is nothing wrong with continuing to progress in knowledge and learn from mistakes. But to think that we have it all figured out (especially when our opinions are contradictory to the Word of the one who created all things) is not to learn from our own history.

(In other words, there have been many times when "the most informed scientific minds on earth" have been wrong. God has never been wrong.)

Answer 4

Yes 40,000 to 400,000 scientists are all wrong and can not see flaws that any high school educated person can easily find.

Or even better, those evil scientists have entered into a conspiracy to trick the world. Funny that no one has ever talked about it in the last 150 years...

Edit:
Don't people realize that Science is designed to be self correcting? That yes you learn from others but you are expected in not required to challenge what is known or presented? That you receive as much creditability for disproving someone else's work as you do for publishing your own?

Answer 5

Sarcasm is the product of a weak mind. And so is taking a ton of coincidences and calling them a theory. Praise the LORD.

Answer 6

Yes, let's all join the Flat Earth Society and march off to Lala Land together!

Answer 7

Don't put so much faith in these "informed scientific minds". Their education is only as good as the people who taught them, and if those people were wrong, then they are wrong, too.
It isn't the "facts" that support evolution; it's their INTERPRETATION of the facts. Evolutionists want you to believe that there interpretation is part of the fact, but it is far from.

Answer 8

That's not a question, you've just put ? on the end of a statement

Please refer to this link for some schooling.

http://anthro.palomar.edu/evolve/evolve_3.htm

Edit - I just realised I missed the whole point of your question and the way you phrased it, like a fair few others. I do apologise.

Answer 9

Well, as you can see, chewin' tabackie can rot the brain.
lol

Answer 10

I was taught in my biology class that there is no evidence against evolution. I will continue to believe it until someone else proves my beliefs wrong. I have listened to all the people and all their "proof" against it. So far it's all been bull crap.