2007-10-16 04:47:08 · 16 answers · asked by Eric C 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It sounds like you just had a thought - or read somebody else's - and assumed it to be true. Try researching - it is a valuable aid to learning.
Some people say there is no such thing as the invisible pink unicorns. There are tens of thousands of references to unicorns in literature - probably as many references as there are about Adam & Eve. By YOUR 'analytical' process, unicorns must exist.
2007-10-16 04:49:54 · answer #1 · answered by Dharma Nature 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Who says that Adam and Eve were pasty white creatures like the Europeans? While the Northern Europeans may have become dominate in the art work, and paint Adam and Eve in their "image", it doesn't mean they are right. And even most of the Europeans are not pasty white creatures! You do know about genetics, group isolation and pooling, right? That certain features become dominate, and that these are what differentiates the so-called "races". I will use a personal example. My maternal grandfather was an albino Irish man. Now, the standard teaching is that dark hair is the dominate over blond. My brother, with dark brown hair, married a Native American with very black hair. But the strong effect of my maternal grandfather's genes, six of their 7 children were all blonds, but with brown eyes. While they are 1/2 Indian, you would never think that by their appearance. Only one daughter took my sister-in-laws looks, a Beautiful head of dark hair, and a wonder skin tone that reflected her mother's heritage. Adaptation has never been disputed, just that it leads to development of totally new species, which can not interbreed with previous "family" members. The famous finches of Darwin's research, while eating from differing food sources, still interbreed, and exchange features between food hunting styles. And not one of those finches have evolved into, say a cat.
2016-05-22 22:54:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HOWS THIS SOUND
Gilgamesh=the older story of god and Adam&Eve up to and including the flood
(only difference is the serpent was changed to the devil,instead of being god in the chatholic version)
2007-10-16 04:51:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You didn't really ask a question, you made a statement, and not one I can really understand maybe something about evolution but you just popped a "?" at the end of it. Evolution is being scientifically proven, which gives it more weight than the bible no matter how thick it is.
2007-10-16 04:51:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Read up on the original story the Garden of Eden myth was plagiarized from.
2007-10-16 04:51:33 · answer #5 · answered by American Spirit 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Do you mean "ever hear of Adam and Eve"? Maybe you should pray for skill at spelling.
2007-10-16 04:51:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mountains of evidence vs. a symbolic story.... I'll take the evidence.
There is no clash between creationism and evolution. Evolution is the process of creation, God is the MasterMind of it all.
2007-10-16 04:50:22 · answer #7 · answered by Dolores G. Llamas 6 · 8⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like you use English as a second or third language.
2007-10-16 04:50:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
well it's not really a question
of course i have heard of adam and eve. Have u heard of the easter bunn and santa claus? Same thing.
2007-10-16 04:50:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
That sounds extremely uneducated.
2007-10-16 04:56:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋