Prominent creation scientist Em Adjineri has been studying evolution and discovered that evolution scientists think that we came from cavemen. However, it is obvious that cavemen could not have evolved.
If cavemen had evolved from caves, we would expect to see genetic similarities between caves and peoples. After studying cave DNA for several months, Em Adjineri discovered that caves don't have DNA. Therefore, they could not have turned into people.
Also, according to evolution it should be possible for a cave to get hit by a tornado and turn into a caveman. But no cave has ever been hit by a tornado and turned into a caveman, except for once and that time was a fluke.
Therefore evolution is false. The only alternative is the literal truth of the Bible.
2007-10-16 02:03:16 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
After a bunch of requests I've finally compiled some of Em Adjineri's best work. It can be found here:
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-w4i3C5g0dbcL1MJpTbM-?cq=1
2007-10-16 02:03:53 · update #1
Bajingo, you just gave Em Adjineri a great idea for her next study. She's borrowing your point #2 if you don't mind.
2007-10-16 02:17:42 · update #2
ppl, 'cavemen' R false, another Athiest lie from a Satan.
Athiest - answer me this:
1. If a man came from a cave, Y r their still a caves?
2. If a fossil came from a monkey, Y r their no fossils alive now?
3. No lieing.
UPDATE: No Em, U use it 2 bcuz ideas R free.
2007-10-16 02:07:16 · answer #1 · answered by Bajingo 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
They lived in caves as you probably do in a house.
Those caves you refer too is where they have found the Neanderthal footprints of existence. Like the use of fire and what the cave dwellers used to eat and the stone tools they used.
Then came you and me Homo-sapiens who could be considered to be Adam and Eve in your religious beliefs.
It takes lateral thinking to understand just how the earth has evolved over the billions of years since the god-substance of the molecule joined the atoms together and created life.
Check the word evolution on the Webb and you can compare your notes of what this person who you refer to as being correct as you have suggested.
2007-10-16 02:32:05 · answer #2 · answered by Drop short and duck 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What?! Humans or cavemen evolved from caves? That's not evolution. Its transformation from a cave to cavemen, or from rocks to ...er... humans, which is as magical as Creation that evolution has sought to disprove! Maybe Em Adjineri is trying to make his point, that evolution is a myth. But his premise from which he deduce that point is, I think, mistaken.
2007-10-16 02:39:52 · answer #3 · answered by Lance 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"If cavemen had evolved from caves, we would expect to see genetic similarities between caves and peoples."
Shouldn't we expect to see genetic similarities between cavemen and people, not between caves and peoples?
What kind of logic is that? Since when caves have DNA?
I guess I'd rather ask a caveman what he thinks about creationists ... LOL
2007-10-16 02:25:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Windom Earle,
I thank you for your post. I thought that we, who read, had suffered a great loss when the Republican genius Dan Quayle disappeared off the face of the planet (no doubt at the hands of the few Republicans who also read).
Then came Dubya to provide the natural funny comments and ideas that so defined Dan.
Now you! Thanks again for the statement complete with all the usual bad science of thumperism. You have made my day and I truly appreciate your efforts to keep us happy, with smiles and chuckles.
After all, it is with humor that we can avoid the vitriol so common now that the Bushites have courted the thumpers for their voting block.
Thanks gain!
2007-10-16 02:14:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Don't forget, no one has EVER found any transitional fossils which are half cave and half caveman either. I think that this is OBVIOUS that evolution is false!
Edit -- tentofield, as you can see, he HAS duped many people! He doesn't need any misspellings or anything like that!
2007-10-16 03:19:10 · answer #6 · answered by Tikhacoffee/MisterMoo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neanderthal are a different branch of the tree and a different kind of human
evolution is false., because a cave didn't give birth to a Neanderthal wow what a theory
2007-10-16 02:13:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Alas, Windom Earle, you contribution was spelt correctly and was also grammatically correct. This was a clear indication that your tongue was very much in your cheek even without the clues you inserted. No creationist I have ever read can write so well.
Put a few mistakes in next time, you might suck a few in. Anyway, thanks for the chuckle, it's time for bed in Australia so I'll be off with a smile.
2007-10-16 02:11:11 · answer #8 · answered by tentofield 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2007/06/22/Fantastic_070620102721434_wideweb__300x375.jpg
Heard that they traced his DNA to a cave in Egypt...
2007-10-16 02:08:42 · answer #9 · answered by Jess H 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
All men are genetic descendants of Adam (the first man--1 Cor. 15:45), with all post-Flood men also being descended from the loins of Noah (Gen.9:1). 'Cavemen,' i.e., those who took refuge in caves (NEVER transitional "Ape-men"), are only mentioned after the Flood (Job 30:3-6ff/ Gen. 19:30/ 1 Sam.24:3-8ff, etc.), with Adam's immediate descendants being highly intelligent and advanced enough even to construct cities (Gen. 4:17)!
2007-10-16 02:07:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋