English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-15 21:04:08 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

and kill all 150000 troops

2007-10-15 21:05:12 · update #1

and take another 20000 thousnad as a hostage

2007-10-15 21:09:37 · update #2

i want to know this war scenario .i am not agains of any parts

2007-10-15 21:15:34 · update #3

thatswhy i asked it in military section

2007-10-15 21:18:29 · update #4

i dont think US would nuke Iran. what about oil and all those 5 years in IRAQ?

2007-10-15 21:23:01 · update #5

what about US hostages?

2007-10-15 21:27:23 · update #6

14 answers

ummm justice is finally prevailed?!
and no,i dont think america could vanish iran from the world map as other ppl think america could.
big war will happen just like america always wanted the world to be like.

2007-10-15 22:43:23 · answer #1 · answered by mightywords. 3 · 1 3

Number one and most important Iran does not have enough missiles to inflict that many deaths of American soldiers in Iraq. Number two is that they cannot possibly take that many prisoners. The reasons for one and two is the fact that our people are spread out all over Iraq and are not just sitting at a bus stop waiting for this to happen.

If Iran were to launch any sort of attack on US Forces, it would be the end of Iran. We would not use nuclear weapons because they are unnecessary in this case. First we soften them up by destroying their military command and control system, destroying the large weaponry (tanks, big guns, etc.), then destroying their army like we did in Iraq. The best part of this is that fact that we can do this without ground troops. Our aircraft with GPS guided bombs can not only hit the truck, but can go through the window of your choice. Once we have finished the air attacks, we walk into Tehran and take over.

2007-10-16 05:10:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

William B is quite right, there's no way Iran could ever pull off a feat like you're saying. Even with hostages, precision munitions would minimize friendly fire while we whiped out enemy positions from the sky. Tehran might not be cheering us as we enter the capitol city, but I'll bet five bucks that after reconstruction puts a McDonalds on top of every building we destroyed, that they'd know the word "supersize" by the time we made them the fifty-first state.

Hopefully Iran isn't that dumb. We would end their nation with a snap of the fingers (and that with 100% conventional attacks).

EDIT: this for twinklylyn... i hope no one cries at your funeral.

2007-10-16 05:44:29 · answer #3 · answered by promethius9594 6 · 1 1

if this was to happen iran would as promised by majhmudeemjjeen (iranian president) simultaneously attack israel bringing israel, another nuclear power, into direct conflict with iran.

it can be argued that the usa has surronded iran on two fronts the west being iraq the east being afghanistan in order to attack iran eventually. however, the iraq campaign being what it is has lead to this strategy being terrible optimistic. the usa could not directly attack iran from iraq plain and simple. it could back israel to air attack it tough

2007-10-16 06:22:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not only will the Iran meet the fate of Iraq and vanish the country from the world map.

2007-10-16 04:21:04 · answer #5 · answered by katkam v 3 · 1 1

its not an military issue its politicy issue.coz iran will not make the same mistake that iraq did in 1990.also there are no any country could be in this case beside iran speacaly russia or china. so do not be afraied it could never be happent. ( forgive me all for ma poor english)

2007-10-16 06:14:01 · answer #6 · answered by Waleed 1 · 0 0

Well, this would be seen as an act of war, so, probably, the US would have to go to war with Iran.

Also countries who are allies with the US, if they feel like it.

2007-10-16 04:15:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I doubt they have that much stuff, training, etc and this question will mainly get a boatfull of idiotic answers like 'nuke em all' unless that is actually what you wanted

2007-10-16 04:13:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

unless they're all stacked on top of each other on some gigantic pile of soldierage, it'd be pretty hard to do that with conventional explosives.

2007-10-16 04:14:09 · answer #9 · answered by meightysix 3 · 4 1

The middle east would be nuked into an oblivion; it would give us an excuse to get rid of all of our enemies.

2007-10-16 04:10:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers