If it has to do with STDs or pregnancy, what about if STDs didn't exist and pregnancy for whatever reason was not a possibility for her? Would you still think it is wrong?
2007-10-15 08:38:38 · 53 answers · asked by Linz ♥ VT 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
what's the point of having multiple sexual partners? for me sex is something I will share only with the person I love
2007-10-15 08:41:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
For the same reasons its wrong for a guy to have multiple partners. No double standards here.
Christianiy aside (which explains the other way I'd explain this) Multiple partners just leads to pain and confusion. Sex is fantastic but no matter how "cool" you are with things it creates an emotional bond. If those emotional bonds are broken to easily it leaves scars.
Also consider this, Biologically people accomodate for their partners, things shrink or expand from association. So having multiple partners can potentially leave you not only mentally, emotionally, spiritually confused, but physically as well, and thats without disease and pregnancy.
Multiple partners hurt in all kinds of ways for guys and girls,
Find the one...its worth the wait.
Good Luck and God Bless
2007-10-15 08:46:59 · answer #2 · answered by Old Wise One 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes that is! Think a woman is promiscuous if she does have more then one sleeping partner. Will you ever be able to submit to one husband? Then if you do get married will you be able to have one man and be faith full to him. The answer will be no you will always won’t more ten one men to get banged by. You will end up getting deforest and remarried over and over and then ask your self why is this happening. It will be so because of a woman’s promiscuous life stile. By all means if you don't want a husband and all ways want to be single and just screw around like a free stile prostitute with out getting the money. That is even if you only have 2 man F*cking you. That will lead to more and more promiscuousety and you will end up not maintaining a stable relationship with one man.
But if you are non religious and never want to get married and never want a little baby of your own with a man you will love and adore never want to see your Children grow up and be proud of them. Never want to the value and appreciation of one man. Yes go a right a head and screw every man you can get your Hades on and it will be essay for you as you have the looks. And don’t even say I hade a hard life of abuse. A woman makes her life what it is. What you have on your mind is what you will have. As your thoughts is a blue print for your life. You thing, you talk, you do
Look at this.
Sow a thoughts reap a word.
Sow a word reap a deed.
Sow a deed and reap a habit.
Sow a habit and you will reap a life stile!!!!!!!!
2007-10-15 09:31:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Women have always been held to higher standards where respect for their bodies are concerned. Women are the bearers of children, and knowing who their fathers are is well, vital I think. However if STD's and pregnancy didn't exist I don't think they'd be held to any different standard, However according to the "scientist" men are compelled to have multiple partners to ensure their "seeds" are carried on and Supposedly this is ver deep seeded. So if pregnancy didn't exist would sex exist? Just a thought!
2007-10-15 08:45:53 · answer #4 · answered by ReBelle 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I personally don't care as long as she isn't sleeping with more than me at the time. STD's are my concern. I'm fine with any woman who wants multiple partners, it's her body, it's her choice. I should be allowed to decide if I want to take the risk of getting a disease. She might not know she has it yet. If STD's were not a factor at all then I wouldn't care in the least. Well, as long as she's cleaned up between. Otherwise that's gross.
2007-10-15 08:49:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Being on the receiving end, women human beings could be very careful. i think of maximum women human beings locate an quite nice line ( if any in any respect) between intercourse and love. so as that they are greater invested emotionally, and greater guarded for that reason too. regardless of in the event that they say it became into basically for exciting, they sense invested. intercourse for many folk isn't a game, even however the media makes it look this is. I also have a stressful time with the wording "distinctive intercourse companions". distinctive intercourse companions is quite promiscuity. it is not a word utilized by potential of moralizing judgmental human beings. this is a word utilized by potential of experts, to describe a sexual habit. and individuals normally have that habit after having been molested as a new child. yet on actual of all that, i think of the intercourse industry promotes sexual freedom, and by no potential teaches secure practices.
2016-10-09 07:00:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it's immoral or wrong. It's a personal choice that's no one's business but those who are directly involved. If it's within the context of an open relationship, I think that the possibilty of hurt feelings is significant. But if all parties are agreeable and comfortable with the arrangement, I don't see the harm.
But that being said, I personally don't think I'm emotionally equipped to participate in such an arrangement. I don't like to share.
2007-10-15 09:06:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its more of the pricipal behind it
I don't think that men are any better for it than women its wrong no matter what sex we are.
Your creator made love,sex and the family
Sex was made for the reproduction of the species it feels good so that we would keep doing it
If it didn't feel sooo good then none of us would be here today mankind would have been extinct a long time ago
2007-10-15 08:45:04 · answer #8 · answered by chariese b 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it is immoral, but...I do think it is better to be in monogamous relationships. Even if you are in multiple monogamous relationships, that is better for you (in my book) than multiple random partners.
I'm basing this on the emotional stress it puts on people when multiple partners are involved and also from the biological perspective, it is advantageous to be monogamous at some point, especially when you have children.
Emotionally and psychologically, people are happier when monogamous (many studies have shown this), but I don't recall exactly why (security maybe?).
2007-10-15 09:18:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No problem at all if you like emotional rollercoasters. Have as many partners as you want but this is what happens you like that one person and then they end up liking someone else because their sex was better then yours and now you feel left out and next thing you know you literally get screwed for nothing. It's all about your heart and eventually you will find someone you want to be with just by yourself and to have and to keep and you will hurt because he wants someone else. Keep your attention on that prize that you want and you don't have to worry about STD's or looking for better sex anywhere else. Try it.
2007-10-15 08:46:12 · answer #10 · answered by level_9yo 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I need to see more in your Avatar... lean a little closer next time when taking the digital photo.
Oh...and immoral is not following the 10 commandments...or not following biblical advice....such as marraige before sex etc. right? So THAT is why it is immoral. Do YOU have mutlitiple sex partners?
2007-10-15 08:42:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋