It depends on who you ask.
If Riegan was the missing link then she would be a transitional form. Since creationists ignore transitional forms, they'll ignore Riegan's existence too.
2007-10-15 07:34:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'll take out Mr. Adjineri for 10 Great British Pounds and an Iron Maiden hip flask.
2007-10-15 07:36:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Return Of Sexy Thor 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
there is an oxymoron on your question, that is "advent scientist." Em couldn't carry a candle to an evolutionary biologists (in the different case everyday as a biologists) like Richard Dawkins. you received't agree consisting of his atheism although that is hard to disclaim that his protection of evolution is between the perfect in our era.
2016-10-21 05:12:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by wexler 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anything is possible when dealing with Em Adjineri scientists.
2007-10-15 07:32:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pirate AM™ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nothing can disprove Em Adjineri science!
He'll just be back with more!
2007-10-15 07:32:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No way! Em Adjineri is never wrong! Ignore, ignore, ignore!
2007-10-15 07:36:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Linz ♥ VT 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes I think she most definitely has.
I am so proud of my wife.
2007-10-15 07:34:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by darwinsfriend AM 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
He'll just be back with more
2007-10-15 09:23:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Arielle B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, she ain't fossilized yet. :-P
2007-10-15 07:32:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
RIEGAN is the BOMB DIGGITY!!! she could be...could be.
2007-10-15 07:32:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by ddking37 5
·
2⤊
0⤋