Prominent Creation Scientist Em Adjineri has recently been studying the abundance of Vile Temptresses on Yahoo! Answers. She has discovered that they conclusively disprove evolution.
We have VTs now, but in the Bible women whom men couldn't resist were called "harlots." It is obvious that if evolution is true today's VTs should have a direct lineage to the harlots of the past.
However, there has never been a half-VT half-harlot transitional fossil ever found! Additionally, there has never been a temptress fossil found that is only partially vile. They are either vile or not vile. This proves that "vileness" is irreducibly complex.
Therefore, Vile Temptresses could not possibly have evolved. So evolution must be false! If evolution is false, then creationism is true and should be taught in University biology classes.
2007-10-15 07:15:22 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Riegan: You're not a fossil yet. :P
2007-10-15 07:20:44 · update #1
i beg to differ
2007-10-15 07:18:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Unfortunately your theory is wrong on almost all accounts.
Vile Temptress is a social evolution not a physical evolution.
The meme fossil evolution trail is easy to follow from your previous posts (including the constant changing of your viewed name).
Besides social fossils fragments going back through biblical times and even earlier prove that women developed into vile temptresses before written history.
There have been occasional evolutionary forays into open displays of Vile Temptry, but those are often short lived and not conductive to the continuing of the female sub-species.
Only in modern times has a social environment developed that can support a population of openly Vile Temptresses (ie: Y!A, science fiction conventions, Dutch dominatrix houses, etc)
2007-10-15 07:59:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The problem with your theory is that it doesn't cover a long enough period of time. The "harlots" mentioned in the Bible existed only about 6,000 years ago; evolution takes millions and millions of years.
Dr. R. Uri Lee of the University of Northern South Dakota (eastern campus) in West Hoople has found conclusive fossil evidence that VTs have, in fact, evolved from the dinosaurs known as Raptors. The sharp claws and sharper intelligence are just two of the many similarities Dr. Lee has found.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but science rules!
.
2007-10-15 08:03:09 · answer #3 · answered by Stranger In The Night 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Dumb question Im afraid....
There is a half-vile Temptress fossil at the Smithsonian's Natural History museum (which they had to move to the basement because the men were "drooling" all over it)
and
also in DC is a transitional harlot standing on the corner of 14st SW and F street right this very minute!!!
Do your research!!!!!!!!
2007-10-15 07:25:30 · answer #4 · answered by srsly 5 · 10⤊ 0⤋
I love Em Adjineri.
Clearly, the VT/ harlot fossil gap proves that the theory of evolution is a charade. The question is, who created VT's? Was it God or the Devil?
P.S. -- You really shouldn't be so hard on Agent Cooper.
2007-10-15 07:22:20 · answer #5 · answered by Pull My Finger 7 · 9⤊ 0⤋
My research about vile temptresses shows clearly that they were a creation... now, we may have to engage in spirited debate over whether a god, or a god believer, was the creator... lol
In the meantime... enjoy the vile temptresses, for they are a spirited bunch of people!
2007-10-15 07:24:51 · answer #6 · answered by Ũniνέгsäl Рдnтsthέisт™ 7 · 8⤊ 0⤋
I agree but it should only be taught by Em Adjineri herself! I'm sure that such a great scientist should have no problem being in multiple places at once, imagine the possibilities.
2007-10-15 07:22:17 · answer #7 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You are dreaming of the demise of Kirk Cameron. The banana is attract him, like a moth to a flame. The iron has writing on it, in small script is says "The atheist nightmare". Once Kirk walks up to take the banana, the VT will introduce him to 'the atheist nightmare'.
2016-05-22 19:11:57 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Flawless logic, as always Windom! All hail created VTs! May we all get VDs from coupling with VTs!
2007-10-15 10:37:33 · answer #9 · answered by average person Violated 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Creation is not taught in schools because scientists know that their theories, which they call facts, would be contradicted if students were allowed to compare creation with evolution and decide for themselves.
There are just too many contradictions in the THEORY of evolution.
2007-10-15 07:24:41 · answer #10 · answered by angelo 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Em Adjineri science prevails again!
2007-10-15 07:34:10 · answer #11 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋