Should the U.S bomb Russia?

Question

..I'm getting sick and tired of Russia playing games. Russia, clearly, is a BIG player in Iran's hardcore nuclear stance. I, personally don't trust the Russian's, and I think a pre-emptive strike on Moscow, would be neccassary concurrent with a Iranian strike.

Answer 1

Bombing Russia woudl have been a good idea at the end of WW2. We had more men under service. We had The Bomb AND the balls to use it. At the time we were supplying the USSR with the majority of their basic supplies like shoes, food and clothing. They woudl not have made it through WW2 without the USA. We sent them everything including tanks and ammunition. Right now that line of thought would get the whole world back to war and everyone killed.

Answer 2

Ha! Ha!. I guess you were born later in the '90s. So you have never had any idea of how it is to live under the Cold War period.

Honestly speaking, I consider Putin a lot more reasonable and fair than any of his predecessors. He is always open to discussions and exchange of ideas with most of the leaders of the EU and the US.

I could understand Condi Rice's frustrations over her last meeting with Putin, but that's how things work within the world of foreign diplomacy, and the reason why every nation need to have really good diplomats. Just imagine how it would be if Condi Rice had to talk with old Cold War leaders like Nikita Kruschev or Leonid Brezhnev (who were a lot more aggressive and threatening on the negotiating table). I'm sure she would be feeling much worse than she feels now. So far, the only US diplomats of the past who managed to defuse antagonism with Russia, China, and the Middle East successfully under stressful situations were the likes of Henry Kissinger and Madeline Albright. Unfortunately, the US don't have diplomats of such high caliber nowadays. This is particularly true with the Bush administration, where foreign diplomacy had been its least priority.

Answer 3

genuinely we could haven't any determination on the thank you to respond-militia action could be required by employing the U. S. and all different NATO countries in accordance with the NATO alliance; Poland is a member of NATO. different ecu countries could additionally in all threat connect in as Poland is an ecu member additionally. it could be confusing in the beginning up however the single element is there are nonetheless extra US troops in Europe at NATO bases then their are interior the ME and the heavy kit is often there additionally. If NATO or the U. S. backed down and did no longer something then could besides decrease the flags and resign now through fact the Russians does no longer end. cutting-edge situation is on the subject of the comparable as 1930's Hitler and Germany being performed by employing Putin and Russia and the reaction could be that we found out from Chamberlain that appeasement does no longer artwork and take the course Hitler forced by employing the invasion of Poland in 1939 did.

Answer 4

then that will be the end of the entire universe, Russia is not a joke we all know that. USA can do it but you don't know what many countries are having against USA, they don't like the USA, and your ideas of bombing a country like Russia is totally ridiculous and i don't think USA will even dare to do it especially this time with so many thing going on. I am currently studying in china but i know why Iran is talking big, think about it. You touch Russia, you touch china and from there japan,UK, Israel will all be involved. Then we are all broke, i don't know how old you are otherwise i will advice you not to take management cos it will not work out.

Answer 5

Uh no do you remember all those nukes Russia built during the cold war? yeah they didn't just disappear. No what we need to do is fund an uprising against that nut job Vlad Putin but make sure nobody knows we are doing it. Wars should be fought with supplies and checkbooks using other countries soldiers our own guys should only be used when absolutely necessary

Answer 6

Having serviced those special munitions you are so casually talking about using Let me say that they are the last option on the board. Once one of them gets used again, then there will be massive global weather changes because about a half dozen trumped up little dictators will use theirs rather than lose them.

If we decide there is no alternative to their use it will not be to save ourselves but to eliminate as many other special weapons as possible so that a reminant of the human race can start trying to climb out of the stone age again!

Please post rational informed educated opinions, so that people do not label everyone who agrees with you on some other answer or question, as crazy!!!!!

Answer 7

I concur with the Ranger dude
you are definitely on a whack ride !!
"YOU don't 'trust' the Russians --- yet YOU'RE the one talking murdering THEM (and that is what a "pre-emptive stike" IS by the way --- murder!!) !!! THIS would set off doomsday devices all over the freaking planet !!
Please do not EVER run for any position of decision making power -- you are clearly short some circuits on major issues !!!

Answer 8

You think things are bad now? :o)

Trust me the U.S bombing Russia = BIG mistake

It will only shorten the time we have on this planet
(Before china takes over and then we are all screwed big time)

Once china takes over, everyone will be calling the disasters that happened this decade and such (Bush being president)
The good old days.

Answer 9

look we're already destroying our own planet - thats reeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaally gonna help - personally i think no-one should have nukes - like how come the US goes around saying other people cant even have nuclear power cos they could all be terrorists when they probably have at least 20 warheads

Answer 10

Are you retarded?

Do you WANT there to be nuclear winter??

You think the Russians won't bomb YOUR asses right back??