Pick one of the following:
1 - A guy with lots of money, but distant has no time to spend with you and is not romantic in the least.
2 - A guy who makes you laugh, is very kind and loving to you, but cheats every turn he can (without you ever finding out).
3 - A guy who is the ultimate romantic, sweeps you off your feet, but has no cash what-so-ever and looks to you for financial support.
Please don't take attributes from each to the other, it's a package type deal.
Whom would you pick?
2007-10-14 18:00:16 · 42 answers · asked by whuz007 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
none of the above. Get real! I've been there done that with #3 and you know what - that guy didn't respect himself and in the end, I didn't respect him either. Hence, he's outta my life.
#2 - Fortunately for that guy, I never met up with him. If I had, you better bet on your balls that he would never cheat again.
#1 - if you have the money, you have the means to stay with each other so I'm wouldn't buy that excuse for a dollar.
The ideal man is the humble man that knows his worth and treasures his mate. The ideal man is the man that is responsible and committed to his family and works hard to achieve his goals. The ideal man inspires faith and love in those whose lives he touches. You should aspire to be that man, not some "package" deal.
2007-10-14 18:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by Insomniac Butterfly 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
3
2007-10-14 18:49:54 · answer #2 · answered by happywhereIam 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
3
2007-10-14 18:08:45 · answer #3 · answered by serene 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if I must choose from the above, it would be the romantic #3. I make enough money to support us both and he would at least be contributing something to the relationship.
I don't need guy #1 at all, and guy #2 is a liar, so his loving kindness is only superficial. And although I really don't need traditional romance, at least guy #3 is truly in the relationship, even if he has no cash.
2007-10-14 18:11:08 · answer #4 · answered by Mystic 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmm. Number 3. I make my own money. I guess it's choosing the lesser of 3 evils: a cold *******, a liar, and a dependent person.
Anyway, number 3. If a guy is romantic, sweeps me off my feet, then who cares about the rest. I jsut got out of a relationshio with a mixture of #1 and #2; rich, never around, made me laugh, but was a compulsive liar.
2007-10-14 18:08:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. 2 if I had to choose. Nothing beats a guy who makes me laugh, plus is kind and loving. And it wouldn't matter if he cheated because I wouldn't find out. That's a fair deal.
I guess if I did find out, that would be out of the question.
Money isn't crucial to me, either way - lots of it, as in no.1 or lack of it, as in no. 3.
2007-10-14 20:31:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would pick guy number 1. I would hope that we had children and I would devote my time to our children. I would be unhappy if a guy is going to cheat on me or expect me to support him. #1 I am putting my life at risk if I am with a guy who cheats (what if I get aids or some other deadly std). #2 if I pick a guy that expects me to support him that means I am making enough money to be all by myself:) I hope this answer helps, but I would definetly pick the guy with lots of money and no time for me because of work.
2007-10-14 18:11:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How can a guy be kind and loving if he always cheats? I don't care about money but I like to see people every now and then regardless of wether they had money!! So i would choose 3.
2007-10-14 18:08:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ooohhh. That's tough. If I have to pick, then number 3 because I am the breadwinner anyway. I kinda like having financial control!
2007-10-14 18:03:43 · answer #9 · answered by hurricane197 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would pick guy number 3 because we would have a good time even without money.
2007-10-14 18:03:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋