I mean everything, every piece of paper in amedical record, the chart itself. Associates wear a bar coded badge that clocks us in, let's us in doors, pays for our meals, giftshop, etc. So, logically, the next big thing is to chip people with a barcode that accesses all of their medical records. because evrything is or will be going completely electronic. It seems to be paving the way towards soemthing dangerous. Or am I just old fashioned and like paper better?
2007-10-14 10:26:04 · 21 answers · asked by America scarica 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You're just old fashioned, do not fear man, fear God. God Bless.
2007-10-14 10:28:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
Your question can't really be answered by people who don't know you because who knows whether or not you're old fashioned , although I do think it's a good idea to have the bar codes for what the hospital already does. As for putting chips into people its already being done to people's pets so I think it may be a possibility one day, which is scary but I think too many people would object to being bar-coded so that would probably be a long way off .
2007-10-14 10:33:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nah...it helps make life easier. There's so much "stuff" out there that needs to get from one place to another that putting a code on it is the best way.
I wouldn't like to be barcoded myself, but you can be identified by your photo or your teeth, so why would a chip be that much scarier.....except if you live in the US of course. Human rights don't seem to mean to much to the US govt. Just check out New Orleans and Guantanamo...Now that's scary!!
2007-10-14 10:31:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Something dangerous? What's so dangerous about quick and easy access to necessary information? It's no more exploitable than paper information that isn't taken care of properly. At least you can encrypt electronic info, a process far too unweildy to use on 'hard copies' of stuff.
Every hour of paperwork (as well as reducing consumption of the paper itself) you can eliminate can be used to save another life.
2007-10-14 10:29:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
NO, It's just faster and makes ordering things a lot easier, all the information can be up loaded to the company, it's good for inventory also, you don't have to count things by hand any more.
2007-10-14 10:30:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i think putting chips in people is a good idea
think about this
u get shot in the main artery and u are losing blood fast
u are UN conscious how do they know who u are Ur blood type and all that stuff
answer chip in Ur head
2007-10-14 10:35:03 · answer #6 · answered by hunter93007 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it terrifies me. it means that the end times are coming. and also did u know that they are forcing our millitary to have the chip in. they are also starting to put chips in babies. it is getting bad. it is predicted that the end times will happen in a few years. probably by 2010. but of course no one can predict the future.
2007-10-14 10:32:29 · answer #7 · answered by Mel Mel 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are way too old fashion!!
Paper is waste! Those bar codes are great for efficiency.
2007-10-14 10:37:32 · answer #8 · answered by theladygeorge 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i hope so! alot of times my card doesn't work, so a chip would be nice. also it's one less thing to carry. that would be awesome if we could chip everything.. then we could do inventory without hours and hours of scanning and beeping. you could just pull up a program and see where every one in the building was and what they were carrying, etc.. it would be very efficient
2007-10-14 10:30:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
There already working on that, a chip that will be inserted into your forhead,
[like the ones they have for dogs] will have every thing any one needs on it,
2007-10-14 10:30:42 · answer #10 · answered by William B 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
My first encounter with this was at MD Anderson hospital in Houston. I really thought it was great and it made things go a lot faster.
2007-10-14 10:29:59 · answer #11 · answered by aswkingfish 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋