We share 99% of our DNA with apes. If that's completely meaningless, I would think DNA testing is meaningless.
2007-10-14 09:34:52 · 11 answers · asked by Paperdoll 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There is claim that humans and apes share 95 percent of their genetic information and that this is proof of evolution. It is also shown for example, the genetic analyses published in New Scientist have revealed a 75% similarity between the DNA of nematode worms and man. This definitely does not mean that there is only a 25% difference between man and these worms! It is surely natural for the human body to bear some molecular similarities to other living beings being that we are on the same planet. This "common material" is the result not of evolution but of "common design," that is, of their being created upon the same plan.
2007-10-14 09:42:01 · answer #1 · answered by thundercatt9 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
that is my rebuttal. I settle for the very undeniable truth that the DNA sequencing is so heavily matched between human beings and chimpanzees. I easily don't have any situation with that by any skill. That suggested, precisely WHAT Alien DNA might want to you've obtainable to make the declare that there is that problem-free ancestry. So i will so, what you suggested would not artwork besides: you're an artwork historian/conosseur. you're confronted with an task. A painiting has been cutting-edge in a persons'' basement with out, for some reason, a signature. Your boss' trust that the artist is, say, a guy by technique of the call of Michaelangelo even though it is your interest to authenticate that. "by technique of George", that is a Michaelangelo, you proclaim. Why? Did the finished guy smack you on the pinnacle and say "whats up, it really is MY artwork"? No. You known the artist because in his different artwork you've considered problem-free threads: using sunshine, the variety of strokes, the thems, etc. you may as properly take the representation and picture of a way dressmaker and how women individuals can comprehend a gown as being from one dressmaker or yet another because of recognizable good factors. questioning alongside those lines, is it that confusing to settle for that "the Grand author" might want to really have commonalities in his advent? reply surely. ============ Brook: ok I concede the Michaelangelo factor. i'm straightforward that way. So p.c.. an artist of selection. Renoir possibly. ?? :) and definite there are artists who attempt to reproduction the masters, although the masters themselves continually stand out, do not they? and that i can fully understand your wanting to be particular. My rivalry, although, is that you may want to be particular in case you extremely looked with an open concepts. I loved this debate factor btw. :)
2016-10-21 04:00:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I couldn't care less if we shared 100% of our DNA with apes.
What matters is there is hardly any resemblance between apes and humans physically and mentally. That means humans were created separate from animals.
2007-10-14 09:49:43 · answer #3 · answered by Andy Roberts 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I did not come from ape,s ,so I don't need DNA to tell me I
I,m from God,I know I am.Yoy see I believe in God.
2007-10-14 09:42:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think it's closer to 98%, and you're right...if you deny the science that discovered DNA, why put your faith in DNA testing????
Maybe it's just a case of "intelligent genetics".....
2007-10-14 09:39:06 · answer #5 · answered by Adam G 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
We all are made from the same stuff. God can make things aged, so the argument is pointless. What a difference the 15 difference makes though, think about that! : )
2007-10-14 09:40:12 · answer #6 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
okay...we have about 600000 pages worth of information from DNA...(scientifically proven)..
1% of that is 6000 pages (it's actually about 2% so more like 12,000 pages)...(6th grade math)...so that means that we are 6 thousand pages different from apes...
We are about .0000024% different from every other human, or about 1.44 pages
that's a big difference...6000>1.44 (3rd grade math)
2007-10-14 09:40:08 · answer #7 · answered by notw777 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All faiths deny science in one way or other. This is just one example.
2007-10-14 09:41:14 · answer #8 · answered by Monkey Man 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
we also share a large portion of our DNA with a dandelion, that doesn't prove anything.
2007-10-14 09:45:21 · answer #9 · answered by Matthew 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Maybe you should ask, how many genes do humans have and how many genes do apes have? If they are the same, then you have a valid argument.
GOD bless
2007-10-14 09:40:01 · answer #10 · answered by Exodus 20:1-17 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋