2007-10-14 05:25:25 · 21 answers · asked by david b 2 in Sports ➔ Auto Racing ➔ NASCAR
FOX rocks..Mike Joy, DW and Larry Mac make the races fun and interesting. They dont focus the whole race on one particular driver like espn does with Jr. They also stay impartial when calling a race. Rusty Wallace roots for Penske every single freaking race. Fox pit reporters are better, the Hollywood hotel is better then Espns pre race show with the token black guy who doesnt have a clue about racing and the women who is used to doing football. Cant wait for Fox in 2008. O and they dont dumb the race down with stupid graphics like the draft track or go to the tech center which is freaking pointless.
2007-10-14 06:11:21 · answer #1 · answered by 24fan 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
FOX is a lot more fun, its just more entertaining. I do like ABC/ESPN because its a lot more simple and to the point, but they need to lighten up sometimes, and they have no real post race interviews and I just don't like that. FOX has more interviews, so yeah FOX is better for nascar.
2007-10-14 10:40:39 · answer #2 · answered by pm8859 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i love the personalities on fox yet I desire ESPN coverage. ESPN announcers appears to be like somewhat more suitable specialist and they offer more suitable balanced coverage of each and every of the drivers in the course of the race. Fox in basic terms seems to spotlight some drivers. Fox also provides way too a lot praise and interest to Jimmie Johnson. even at the same time as he's 15 autos back the finished race. Yeah he's powerful yet i pick balanced coverage. I also believe the different solutions that they opt for aspect by technique of aspect coverage for the time of classified ads. extremely how confusing might want to that is to attempt this? Oh yeah, I hate Digger too.
2016-10-21 03:41:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Let's go racin' boys!"
FOX is the absolute BEST.
I wholeheartedly agree with "24fan". Can you believe that?
Can't wait til 08 for 88 and NASCAR On FOX!
NBC wasn't that great but it was sure alot better than ESPN... I miss Benny Parsons. Every now and then I'll think of him, or I'll be watching a race and when something big happens, I'll think of him saying "Oh MAN!" :)
Both NBC and FOX had a trademark man with a trademark saying.
I like Rusty Wallace alot, but sometimes he just doesn't cut it at all....
2007-10-14 10:40:10 · answer #4 · answered by sceptiletcg23 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that Fox should cover the Nascar races all year round. Mainly because it isn't a commercial fest, and the announcers don't talk about the same thing over and over again.
2007-10-14 08:07:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even though I am not a huge DW fan, they definitely do a much better job of coverage than ABC/ESPN. At least when FOX has the coverage, they are not using split screens to show football at the same time or missing the action due to all the commercials.
2007-10-14 22:11:15 · answer #6 · answered by Jayme M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
FOX is best. Rusty needs replacing with someone else. Maybe it will be Dale Jarrett when he retires. He would be a lot better at it. I also hate the way ABC cut off at the end without even interviewing the top finishers.
2007-10-14 13:23:34 · answer #7 · answered by rowdy45 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
fox should by the rights to nascar for the entire season
2007-10-14 06:50:34 · answer #8 · answered by Coni 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well as of now FOX has the best broadcast team and I think they are the best all around.
2007-10-14 16:30:32 · answer #9 · answered by blakree 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fox totally rocks with nascar...can't wait until 2008..I'm thankful that I have sirus radio, so I can listen to the race on PRN or MRN...these guys are great all racing, just the race and real facts...We also have trackpass going as well..these espn/abc guys are awful..
2007-10-14 06:53:00 · answer #10 · answered by Go Team Penske 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋