Faith!
2007-10-14 01:09:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Religion has two parts: the spiritual and the social teachings. The social part is always political because there are social laws in religion. Some religious institutions and some religious folks get involved with partisan politics which by nature is exclusive and divisive. The difference becomes very fuzzy or not at all.
2007-10-14 01:25:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by jaicee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are very similar, as in the old days they were the same thing. Now anyone can follow any religion, within the political laws of the land.
2007-10-14 01:09:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Geisha VT poser 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Religion is about faith in God. Politics is about power. Too often politics uses religion as an excuse to further its ends and people fall for it.
2007-10-14 01:10:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by cmw 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Religion teaches to know who is your creator and God, to love God, to be truthful, never hurt any one, feel your family only with the clean money and not that people by doing Haram (illegal and prohibited means of making money, love fellow humans, thank God for all He provide us etc. etc. All good stuff to become a decent human being. It teaches love for material is waste of efforts as compred to love for God and live contented in what ever God provides us.
Politics teaches how to lie, cheat, manipulate people, ways to steal public funds, make people fool with telling them lies to govern and rule them, to serve the interest of only those who pays the politicians etc. etc. all bad stuff.
Politics is a dirty business and there is nothing good about it.
Good politicians are the one's who know how to hide all their wrong doings and illegal activities, never get caught and do every thing that makes them popular to get elected again.
2007-10-14 01:37:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by majeed3245 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are both manmade and neither will get you to heaven.
God wants a RELATIONSHIP with his people!
"Sacrifice and offerings I do not seek"!
This is all that a religion is. Mans way to make himself acceptable to God. It doesn't work!
Heaven is a free gift that can't be earned!
2007-10-14 01:13:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by witness 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Modern-Day ‘Harlotry’
6 Through her meddling in politics, the great harlot has brought untold sorrow to mankind. Consider, for example, the facts behind Hitler’s rise to power in Germany—ugly facts that some would like to expunge from the history books. In May 1924 the Nazi Party held 32 seats in the German Reichstag. By May 1928 these had dwindled to 12 seats. However, the Great Depression engulfed the world in 1930; riding in its wake, the Nazis made a remarkable recovery, gaining 230 out of 608 seats in the German elections of July 1932. Soon after, former chancellor Franz von Papen, a Papal Knight, came to the Nazis’ aid. According to historians, von Papen envisioned a new Holy Roman Empire. His own short tenure as chancellor had been a failure, so now he hoped to gain power through the Nazis. By January 1933, he had mustered support for Hitler from the industrial barons, and through wily intrigues he ensured that Hitler became Germany’s chancellor on January 30, 1933. He himself was made vice-chancellor and was used by Hitler to win the support of Catholic sections of Germany. Within two months of gaining power, Hitler dissolved parliament, dispatched thousands of opposition leaders to concentration camps, and began an open campaign of oppressing the Jews.
7 On July 20, 1933, the Vatican’s interest in the rising power of Nazism was displayed when Cardinal Pacelli (who later became Pope Pius XII) signed a concordat in Rome between the Vatican and Nazi Germany. Von Papen signed the document as Hitler’s representative, and Pacelli there conferred on von Papen the high papal decoration of the Grand Cross of the Order of Pius. In his book Satan in Top Hat, Tibor Koeves writes of this, stating: “The Concordat was a great victory for Hitler. It gave him the first moral support he had received from the outer world, and this from the most exalted source.” The concordat required the Vatican to withdraw its support from Germany’s Catholic Center Party, thus sanctioning Hitler’s one-party “total state.” Further, its article 14 stated: “The appointments for archbishops, bishops, and the like will be issued only after the governor, installed by the Reich, has duly ascertained that no doubts exist with respect to general political considerations.” By the end of 1933 (proclaimed a “Holy Year” by Pope Pius XI), Vatican support had become a major factor in Hitler’s push for world domination.
8 Though a handful of priests and nuns protested Hitler’s atrocities—and suffered for it—the Vatican as well as the Catholic Church and its army of clergy gave either active or tacit support to the Nazi tyranny, which they regarded as a bulwark against the advance of world Communism. Sitting pretty in the Vatican, Pope Pius XII let the Holocaust on the Jews and the cruel persecutions of Jehovah’s Witnesses and others proceed uncriticized. It is ironical that Pope John Paul II, on visiting Germany in May 1987, should glorify the anti-Nazi stand of one sincere priest. What were the other thousands of the German clergy doing during Hitler’s reign of terror? A pastoral letter issued by the German Catholic bishops in September 1939 at the outbreak of World War II provides enlightenment on this point. It reads in part: “In this decisive hour we admonish our Catholic soldiers to do their duty in obedience to the Fuehrer and to be ready to sacrifice their whole individuality. We appeal to the Faithful to join in ardent prayers that Divine Providence may lead this war to blessed success.”
9 Such Catholic diplomacy illustrates the kind of harlotry that religion has engaged in over the past 4,000 years in wooing the political State in order to gain power and advantage. Such religio-political relationships have fostered warfare, persecutions, and human misery on a vast scale. How happy mankind can be that Jehovah’s judgment upon the great harlot is at hand. May it soon be executed!
2007-10-14 01:46:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
in America, its a fine line... and the "religious right (wing)" is a powerful force in American government - in fact, it controls Bush
2007-10-14 01:06:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by I'm an Atheist 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
You can probably find an answer you can live with in the phrase: "all for one, and one for all"
2007-10-14 01:15:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by tamonmark 2
·
0⤊
1⤋