Did the mother of a civil war soldier have to a citizen in order to receive his pension when he died?

Question

A document says that a relative got a mother's pension. We assume he had a brother that we do not know about that served in the Civil War and that his mother got the pension and then left it to our relative. Supposedly she never came to the US. Would she have to be naturalized to get the money or could she request it over in Ireland?

Answer 1

Post civil war they went as close to the deceased soldiers wishes as they could. Things were not too different then. A lot of Irish sent money home to their folks - just as many Hispanics do now. The "real Americans" looked down on the Irish then too. Some things never change.

Answer 2

Military Pensions were normally paid to the soldiers widow,

Military Pensions were not transferable from one recipient to another.

I have never heard of a Military pension being transfered from one person to another.

However that does not exclude the possibility of some type of Private life insurance being paid.

I would think this would need to be posted on a more specialized site for a good answer.

Answer 3

Brian the canine is robust. If it compensates those with no direct relationship (instantaneous kinfolk) of the vetern, then it relatively is socialism. regardless of the incontrovertible fact that, the plan you're discussing is a pension application offered to citizen squaddies who have been employed via the government. As workers, and as a recruiting gadget, it relatively is sensible to grant reward to stated workers. i might argue that through fact the "accomplice government' replaced into absorbed via the Union (on condition that we additionally abosorbed the charges of the Confederacy), then it relatively isn't any longer socialism. If we had no longer abosorbed the insurrection government, then the 2nd insurrection squaddies won reward, it became socialism. Socialism is using the tax code to redistribute wealth from the could desire to the have not. It seeks to be sure the government, somewhat than the non-public sector, through fact the decider of economic gives you. Nader used the ethical relativism of the socialists (who, BTW, supply decrease than conservatives in blood, money, and time to charity) to justify the socialist loss of social contribution as "A society with greater justice demands much less charity" He in fact argues that being a socialist interior the combat for justice excuses one from certainly having to grant your guy or woman money to look after the unfavorable. Socialists and leftists seem to embody this life form, as they do no longer donate everywhere close to the quantity of money, time, or blood that conservatives donate. regardless of the incontrovertible fact that, John Adams began us down the path of Socialism, and Jefferson, his greatest rival, did no longer something to end it, while Adams engaged interior the steel subsidies that are additionally in place immediately.

Answer 4

I was checking to see if you got any answers. Wrong section, who but an historian would know.
Did they even have pensions?

Answer 5

yes