No where survivors aren't usually buried!
2007-10-13 21:10:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Barb Outhere 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
O wait the survivors?? I don't get it why not take them to the hospital before burying the survivors????
2007-10-13 21:11:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lala 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ummm nicely i assume you ought to bury them in Peru yet that does no longer be diplomatically maximum suitable and could reason a conflict so it could be extra useful to bury them in Canada through fact that is less warm up there and could shelter the bodies till they are able to be decrease back to their families. wish this enables! Aw come on adult men i'm joking! no want for a thumbs down!
2016-10-22 08:41:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the current US administration would have no problems burying the survivors... ;-)
2007-10-13 21:10:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
That's pretty scary if they are burying survivors!
2007-10-14 09:29:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
U'r caught in the past my friend, besides survivors dont get buried....the dead passangers are sent back to their native soil
2007-10-13 21:12:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Thumper 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I hope they don't bury survivors.
2007-10-13 21:17:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Max 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Survivors aren't usually buried or burnt.
2007-10-13 21:12:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by vercetti 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
you do not bury the survivors
2007-10-13 21:10:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Arlene D 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
The survivors weren't dead so they don't need to be buried!
2007-10-13 21:10:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋