PLEASE LOOK AT THE LINK BEFORE RESPONDING!
- Thanks
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/387/ad17b5e3e5oq2.jpg
- Shalom.
2007-10-13
18:07:33
·
26 answers
·
asked by
Automaton
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
I didn't make this, but someone I know had the link to it. So I looked it over and wanted to how people would respond to it. Makes a good point, that's if you read scriptures as literal history.
- Shalom.
2007-10-13
18:16:17 ·
update #1
Burn in hell, me? Ok... an literal hell doesn't exist, sorry. You don't understand the philosophical esoteric nature of scriptures. But thanks anyways.
2007-10-13
18:33:33 ·
update #2
Personally I think it's very funny lol.
2007-10-13
18:34:38 ·
update #3
I don't really feel good intention in the mind who made that. It is unnecessary and cruel. I don't like it, honestly. I wouldn't like if it was Buddha, Allah, or any other deity. I am sorry for the the person who made it. He is desperately trying to get his message across but guess what? Nothing changed in my belief... waste of his time!!
Peace!
2007-10-14 10:16:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Janet Reincarnated 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The bloody body hanging on the timbers called a cross overshadows the nonsensical script. Both Christen and Atheist are stimulated by two separated thoughts in their minds yet, both are filled with compassion. The age-old problem of reconciliation of the qualities of the head and heart is the cause of the fall of humankind. The out of balance condition where the head is leading and leaving the heart behind is found in all aspects of the human tragedy.
The Christen is thankful for some one else paying for their sins. The Atheist is disgusted that every Christen church hangs an ugly reminder of the man’s inhumanity to man on their alter. The Mystic slowly shakes his head and feeds his donkey.
2007-10-14 16:44:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Monk 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm a loose thinking Pagan and those photographs make me sense ill for many motives. a million.they are having toddlers protest! i ought to comprehend if it improve into something small and wonderful like handing out flayers to assist adopting from a glance after as a replace of a breeder and in hassle-free terms employing lovable photographs on the flayer, then it could be okay to have toddlers assist you with activism. yet they have been for sure coaching their toddlers blind hatred. Which (i'm hoping) rather everyone from each and every religious historic past can see is erroneous. 2.Katrina improve into no longer something profound. It improve into profane. How can they even stay with themselves? each and all the lives that have been lost and the lives that are nonetheless ruined. It improve into no longer something religious and it improve into no ones fault. 3.It scares me that there are people who think of like that available and that they are increasing their toddlers to think of with such hate.
2016-10-22 08:28:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Another opinion & changing up the words of the scripture is certainly going to make it sound like it's a fairy tale.
Know God for yourself.
God Bless!
2007-10-13 18:22:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is someone's perversion who is using words to convince others that Jesus is not the King of the Jews and Lord or Lords and Master of the Universe, who came to earth to help us realize who God is and who we are in that relationship to him. Looks like darkness has a hold on that person that created the link and using that person for the spiritual battle raging on. I would say Father forgive them, they know not what they do. This person may be to far gone from home he will never return. God wishes none to parish, but does not interfere in free will. His or Her choice.
Rev. TomCat
2007-10-13 18:19:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rev. TomCat 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Fortunate for the author of that picture, they were making fun of Christianity. Because if it was about Islam or Muhammad, heads will roll, and fire will burn, and riots will go off not in one country but many.
That is why we Christians are being made fun more and more every day.
Shalom
2007-10-13 18:24:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bravado Guru 5
·
10⤊
1⤋
I'm Christian, but I think that the picture is needlessly inflammatory. I don't like pictures of the crucifixion, I worship the living Christ who died and rose again, and whose miracle was not so much in the dying as it was in His experience in the garden and his resurrection.
2007-10-13 18:17:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that it is just someones opinion of what Christianity is.
If the verse had not been added underneath, it might be a picture representation of the suffering that Christ bore for our sins.
2007-10-13 18:15:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by jenx 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
That sums it up pretty well...but I would rather see a picture of a snake having a conversation with a woman in a pretty garden by a tree...
:-)
2007-10-15 06:53:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by strpenta 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
um... i think it is quite graphic but it shows to me the pain and suffering Jesus Christ(the perfect example who had no sin) went through because of his love for is. in my eyes it made me sick just like in Gods eyes it made him sick because all of the sins of the earth were put on Jesus
although i do not think that the use of fire and brimstone and gore is the way to get people to Christ. for me a simple cross gives me the same image.
2007-10-13 18:17:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by SoccerStar234 2
·
1⤊
0⤋