2007-10-13 09:56:33 · 10 answers · asked by Mayhen<3 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
People under 25 and over 75 shouldn't have driver's licenses at all.....
2007-10-15 07:06:08 · answer #1 · answered by lillllbit 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a tough one. Some 16 year olds are more mature than others. The biggest argument against getting your license at this age is that teenagers don't make adult decisions and have a hard time saying no to their friends.
Tough question
2007-10-13 11:13:28 · answer #2 · answered by sammael_coh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I knew a 16 y/o with his license that thought Morocco (the country) was a type of drum.
NO, I don't think so.
2007-10-13 10:00:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think that it completely depends on how mature and responsible they are.
if a teen has any kind of record, or has even remotely gotten in trouble with the law, i think that they should not be able to get it until they are 18.
as far as school goes, i think that its good that a student must have a b average.
2007-10-13 10:07:13 · answer #4 · answered by Kelsey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that is way too young. I think it should be 18. If you can't vote at 16 why should you be able to drive a car?
2007-10-13 16:13:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They do in some states, (read: Florida). It is the cause of most of the accidents we have in this state. Too many young drivers, not enough practice or good judgment.
2007-10-13 11:44:23 · answer #6 · answered by ContainedCHAOS 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I GOT MINE AT 16 IN WASHINGTON STATE IN 1964.
2007-10-13 10:38:14 · answer #7 · answered by ahsoasho2u2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No there to immature at that age and and I think it should wait until there 18.
2007-10-13 10:03:21 · answer #8 · answered by Jarritoco 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it really depends, on how mature the teenager was
2007-10-13 10:03:03 · answer #9 · answered by Amy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
um we already do. duh...(in the states atleast)
2007-10-13 10:16:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋