Have you heard of the latest DNA monkey scam? They claim it proves evolution but they leave out the part about the "keying" of DNA. AKA Ken Miller. We also have 98 percent DNA in common with household cats something else they dont want you to know! There are no transitional fossils folks....
2007-10-13 08:24:46 · 14 answers · asked by theroadwetake 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
lol...
Please provide a hyperlink to a reputable scientific organisation that thinks we have 98% of our DNA in common with housecats.
That's simply not true.
Look you're related to apes whether you like it or not, if you don't like it, stop acting like one.
No transitional fossils? There are many, many thousands. Wilful ignorance like that makes me feel nauseous.
I know its basically impossible to get through to a person of faith but please think about this ONE thing.
Science is not anti-religion or anti-god, its just pro-truth, it explores the universe and tries to answer questions about us. If it contradicts genesis, well tough luck for genesis, I'm sorry.
Is it really so surprising that modern men have learnt more about the world than ignorant bronze-age desert tribes inventing a creation myth?
2007-10-13 08:28:43 · answer #1 · answered by Leviathan 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
There's no such thing a DNA "keying", we don't share 98% of our DNA with cats, and there are tons of transitional fossils. Whatever source you're getting your information from is a load of bull. Evolution is a proven fact, and denying it doesn't make it any less true.
2007-10-13 08:35:34 · answer #2 · answered by JavaGirl ~AM~ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ROFL
Isn't it ironic that your whole belief system is a scam but when someone provides an explanation with evidence you vehemently deny it? We don't have 98% DNA in common with cats, stop making crap up. ALL FOSSILS ARE TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS. Modern evolution states that all organisms are in a state of change. A species is what we decide it is.
2007-10-13 08:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by Ares 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
YOu don't know what you're talking about. There is no "keying" of DNA. And there are transitional fossils. We aren't descended from monkeys and science doesn't say we were. Go back to school before you get any stupider.
2007-10-13 08:29:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Seems you have been reading some creationist propaganda. No science purports what you are saying.
As for transitional fossils, THEY ARE ALL TRANSITIONAL. Try reading about some real science. You won't find it at the "wayofthemaster" web site.
2007-10-13 08:41:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I positively HATE weekends here on Yahoo answers, all the bored little kids crawl out of the woodwork because they are too brain-dead to get a life together and actually DO something with their free time.
2007-10-13 08:35:29 · answer #6 · answered by James M 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In the words of Wiki, regarding 98% similarity with felines....
[Citation Needed]
2007-10-13 08:29:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
1) no.
2) what do you mean with keying DNA? aligning?
3) we don't share 98% of our DNA code with housecats.
4) I don't know about transitional fossil folks, but there are transitional fossils
5) you are writing fairly incoherent nonsense.
2007-10-13 08:28:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Look dude, you want to believe that evolution is a scam designed to make you feel bad about yourself, fine. Go for it. But leave the rest of the world out of it. Alternatively, read a real friggin' book on the subject and THEN come back and apologize for looking ignorant.
2007-10-13 08:29:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
That is correct.The famous apes to man chart is based on assumption not scientific evidence.Darwin based his findings not on fossil findings but on embryology of Hackle who turned out to be a fraud.
2007-10-13 09:32:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋