How can intersection cameras be legal? In court, one has the right to confront ones accuser ,how ?

Question

Whats next radar cams?,in car "data loggers" that must be downloaded at the P.D. every month, at the automatic ticket window?

What happened to"presumed innocent until proven guilty" chill people,I didn't get a"instant ticket",I was just wondering how could anyone "ask a camera how long was the yellow light lit before going red and is the time set to the national standard for yellow lights. And why is the company that owns ALL the cameras complaining about falling revineu because 45% of drivers cant be identified,I thoughtit was about "safety"

Answer 1

While I understand your frustration, personally I'd prefer to get a ticket in the mail generated by a camera and a computer...than receive one directly from a traffic cop w/ a self-righteous attitude and a monthly quota to fill.

Just out of curiosity...exactly what questions would you have for your digital accuser?

"Just because you have a picture of me and my car running the light...how do you know it's REALLY me and my car running the light?"

"Why did I do it?"

"Didn't you think I could make it?"

Keep in mind...if there are mitigating factors that support your side...they can still be presented to the judge. And, since the judge can't cross-examine the picture either, he/she is actually MORE likely to believe your reasoning than if the ticket was handed out directly by a cop (who...based on personal experience... would simply lie on the stand to justify their own position).

Again I agree it's not much of a menu to pick from...but I'd take the pic over the p*ick any day!!! LOL

Answer 2

I agree...They have already had lawsuits about the cameras. I am not sure what we can do about it.
You might want to research this because at least one city was sued because the co. supplying the cameras were getting a % of every ticket. If I remember right..They shortened the yellow lights time so they could make more money from ore tickets.
In any case the lights were adjusted so that the city and the CO would make better profits.

Answer 3

In Batavia Illinois they installed these several years ago and they lost every case that actually went to court. The police officer that was assigned to these ended up going to work for animal control because they had to lay him off. I know chicago and a lot of other areas have this so the judges must differ on opinion about this though in my opinion it's clear that these are proper eveidence to convict someone. These could be used with a range of other evidence to convict the person though these on their own should not be sufficient.

In reality these will be used more and more because it costs more to hire an attorney than just pay most traffic tickets. If you were really flying it might be worth your time and money to hire an attorney though for most people the state is screwing them and just extorting money as usual. They know they have the power and can do whatever they want.

Answer 4

easily all cameras like that besides as % cameras are unlawful. you would opt for to do somewhat analyze. look up top to (of) commute. the following is one excerpt placed of many: "positively the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one position to a distinct in accordance to inclination, is an characteristic of inner most Iiberty, and the right, more often than not, of free transit from or via the territory of any State is a top secured by technique of the 14th change and by technique of alternative provisions of the structure." - Schactman v Dulles, ninety six App D.C. 287, 293. And for kicks, the following is somewhat more suitable: "the position rights secured by technique of the structure are in contact, there might want to be no rule making or law which may abrogate them." - Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491. "The declare and workout of a constitutional top won't be able to be switched over right into a criminal offense.· - Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489. So, yet no longer paying they convert their administrative sanctions right into a criminal offense. in the adventure that they examine factors, they achieve this illegally. in the adventure that they do something to you, they achieve this illegally. come across a constitutional legal specialist - a educated one. you'll lose in decrease courts and also you should report an attraction. yet in appellate courtroom (federal) you may win.

Answer 5

You can still face your accuser in the case. The accuser is usually a city, and an officer can issue a citation when they witness or have probable cause to believe you committed a violation, such as after a vehicle accident. The camera is just their probable cause or evidence. In most places, I believe an officer actually looks at the video/photographs, and if he believes a violation was committed, he signs the ticket before it is mailed.

Answer 6

One must remember a single important issue.

The people request the laws.... the Legislators script the laws and put them in place.. and the Police enforce those laws at the request of the people.

If you feel a law is unjust, it is your right and duty to work to have the law repealed. Call your Representative and work for change. Start a grass roots effort and get the ball rolling.

The police do not think this stuff up. It is the will of the people.

Answer 7

Many jurisdictions do not declare this type of infraction as part of the criminal code (laws). They consider it part of the civil code (laws).

In other words, when you are photograped running a red light they are not prosecuting you for a criminal act; they are suing you which is a civil action.

Spill hot coffee in your lap at a fast food restaurant, you sue them....it's not a crime.

Slip and fall on a wet floor in a grocery store, you sue them...it's not a crime....

Get the idea?

Answer 8

Ah, you do have a right to confront your accuser, in this case, it will be the video of you breaking the law. Forget it, and pay the ticket, they have you nailed.

Answer 9

Why don't you take your ticket to The Supreme Court? Let's find out if it's legal or not.

Answer 10

You can confront your accuser. You can confront the photograph of you running the stop sign / stop light.

Jurisprudence in action!

Good luck.....