Nude photography art?

Question

OK, I am confused. I read about some guy who gets HUNDREDS of girls and women to pose for nude photo shoots, in public places, and NONE of the girls/women have a problem with this; including the public reading about this guy in the paper...

But when someone on Yahoo Answers asks about female nudity on the internet, movies, or even thong swim suits at beaches and public pools, they get all kinds of ANGRY responses from female readers.

Nude public art is OK, but thongs is not?

Answer 1

There's a huge difference in nudity and being naked.

Nude art is beauty. The human form is portrayed in all its naturalness without the suggestiveness of sexual arousal.

I have seen nude art photography, it is well thought out composition, background, lighting, clothing, makeup, hair, design of set, purposeful posings and expressions and overall content and the shoot is done by someone who has actual talent and ability to convey a skill to the height that it becomes artistic expression.

Naked photography on the other hand, leans toward the crude, raw open sexuality that is offensive and nowhere even close to being in the category of art. It is meant to stir sexual arousal

And frankly, anybody can take a picture of someone naked. Nakedness is simply somebody with no clothes on and somebody else taking photos of them. Big difference and of course it illicits a huge difference in reactions to it, exactly as it is meant to.