English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

None, really.

Most of his stuff was plagiarized from the other guys. There's not much original in there. At least Mark is somewhat important, since he was the earliest of the Gospel writers. But even that is only important from the stance of figuring out the kind of superstitions people believed back then. Paul came decades earlier than any of them, though his writings were still decades after Jesus' death, if Jesus existed at all.

2007-10-12 14:02:00 · answer #1 · answered by nondescript 7 · 0 2

Hmm...go back a little to Matt. 24:29-31...the sign of the son of man occurred in 2002. The thing is, the church was sleeping and didn't see it, nor are they really looking for His return. I think that is the most important thing of all right now.

2007-10-12 14:09:14 · answer #2 · answered by witnessnbr1 4 · 0 0

chapter 26:39-43: if you love the lord you would understand.

2007-10-12 14:03:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers