English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean under any circumstance.
an example
someone kills everyone in your family INFRONT of you.. then bbqs them and eats them, and also makes you eat them

would you kill then?

2007-10-12 12:02:05 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

23 answers

Murder is a legal term for the unlawful taking of a life. Defense of yourself or family is not murder.

Yes I would kill to defend myself and my family, that is not murder.

2007-10-12 12:12:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Where do you people come up with this stuff? I wouldn't want to run around barefoot in your mind!!!!!! gross.....I would defend my family if necessary....it is not murder if you are defending yourself. I would shoot to put them out of commission Rather than kill though if I could.

Although I am disturbed with the scripture that says turn the other cheek. What do you think?

2007-10-12 19:12:15 · answer #2 · answered by dreamdress2 6 · 1 0

I could kill to protect my family, but killing as an act of defense is not technically considered "murder" No I could never murder any one in cold blood... no way

2007-10-12 21:03:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If I were to kill under that circumstance seems to me it would make sense to kill him before killing my whole family, don't you think?

But what does that have to do with murder?

2007-10-12 19:21:59 · answer #4 · answered by Steve Amato 6 · 0 0

It's part of the Social Contract for all males. We have to kill things when they threaten the group, and in order to be prepared for that we're a bit murderous.

Think of it as testosterone poisoning.

CD

2007-10-12 19:08:49 · answer #5 · answered by Super Atheist 7 · 0 0

If they hurt my family, yes.

If a man touched any of my beautiful nieces without her consent (and before she reached the age of consent), I'd kill him.

If a man ever touches my daughter (should I ever have one) without her consent, I'll kill him. If a man touches my daughter before she reaches the age of consent, I'd kill him. If any person physically harmed my children (should I ever have any at all), I'd kill them.

Murder is one thing. Killing is quite another. No one hurts my babies, and my nieces and nephews are mine as far as I'm concerned.

2007-10-12 19:12:48 · answer #6 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0 0

That's not murder.
That's execution.

Under those circumstances, yes. I'd kill them.
And there are other circumstances, as well.

2007-10-12 19:16:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Murder? No. And what you are discribing would be murder since it would entail thought, planning, vengence, etc.

Kill? Possibly (self defense or defense of another person)

2007-10-12 19:26:19 · answer #8 · answered by FourArrows 4 · 0 0

I had saw that my family was chopped up and dead once. When, in learning about images through the Image of God, I learned that that is what happened to them spiritually. Someone had did that to their images. I saw, and I could smell the smell of death all around me. It was the most horrific sight I had ever seen in my life.

No, I would not murder somone if they had killed my family than ate them in front of me.

I would however kill someone in my dreams if I had to.

2007-10-12 19:16:45 · answer #9 · answered by white_painted_lady 5 · 0 2

That's a bit extreme dont you think?
I will say this. **** with me or mine and see what happens. I was raised by a Marine sharp shooter. Just keep that in mind.

2007-10-13 00:47:10 · answer #10 · answered by ~Heathen Princess~ 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers