no. its the second worst. the first worst is pascals wager.
pascals wager degrades religion to nothing more then a form of "after-life" insurance. furthermore only works when there are only 2 possible choices. the more choice you add the smaller the probability there is. this feeds off of people that have no understanding of how probability works.
2007-10-12 10:29:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chippy v1.0.0.3b 6
·
8⤊
0⤋
A complex watch needs a creator but a complex God doesn't need one. Wow, that's quite the argument. These people know nothing about science. Complex things have simple origins. Not the other way around. Try taking a critical look around you once in a while.
2007-10-12 17:43:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Patty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Didn't you hear? Dennis Prager, that buffoon of a rightwing talk show host, has plagiarized Paley's Watchmaker and it's now "Prager's Computer On Jupiter". I saw him assert that on Bill Maher.
2007-10-12 17:30:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not the worst, but it is breathtakingly empty.
Believe me when I've said I've heard worse. Sometimes I feel like my brain cells die when I hear some of the claims...
2007-10-12 17:44:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Scott M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question! If you notice technology evolves just like everything else.
2007-10-12 17:30:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shawn B 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Apparently they can't. Two watches can try to copulate all they want but they wont have a little baby watch.
2007-10-12 17:31:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
'the bible says so' is the worst one..
..but this is pretty bad...
2007-10-12 17:31:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Blackbird 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
yeah... the worst is 'i have proof, the bible'...
2007-10-12 17:33:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋