English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For example, creationism in schools and gay marriage. Should we ignore the 1st ammendment? Should we ignore the fact that everyone in this country is supposed to have equal rights? Should our country violate the seperation of church and state and cater to a specific religion just because they over power the government? Should the US be a "Christian Country"? If so, why?

2007-10-12 07:53:54 · 13 answers · asked by getalifeFATTY 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

No, for the simple reason that not everyone in the country is a christian.

Look at it this way - if you went to a muslim country, but were a christian, would you want to be required to follow sharia law? If not, how could you ask non-christians here to follow christian laws?

2007-10-12 07:59:21 · answer #1 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 0 1

Um no. Our laws are based human survival and humanism. If murder was legal there wouldn't be too many of us around now would there be? Common sense stuff. And the Christians weren't the first to think of them any how. They just think they were because that's the crap people have been feeding them. Educated Christians acknowledge the roots of their faith and respect those that came before it.
Just because the country is mostly white does that make us a white country? (Stole that from an earlier quote from Confirmed Atheist)

The laws were based on English laws that borrowed heavily from the Germanic and Celtic clan system. It was also built off of Greek Democracy (You know...that whole voting thing we do?) There is a reason god and slavery were left out of the Constitution. The Founding fathers felt both were too controversial to put in. James Madison, founding father, presented the Treaty of Tripoli that was UNANIMOUSLY signed that has an article (11 to be exact) SPECIFICALLY stating that the US was NOT founded on Christianity. Try reading it sometime.

2007-10-12 08:23:38 · answer #2 · answered by ~Heathen Princess~ 7 · 1 1

NO!

We should not ignore the first amendment, we should not ignore the fact that we are all entitled to equal rights (even if those rights perturb the religious sensibilities of a certain portion of the population), we should NOT violate the separation of church and state which ensures religious liberty for all, and this country never has been and NEVER SHOULD BE a "Christian nation".

As a few respondents have pointed out, we DO live in a democracy, but that absolutely does NOT give us the right to unjustly curtail the basic civil liberties of our fellow Americans.

2007-10-12 08:27:51 · answer #3 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 1 1

That the US laws are founded on Judeo Christian beliefs (the Bible) is not in question. Should there be lessons on one belief or theory and not another? Probably not. Should gay marriage be allowed? Not if the majority doesn't want it to be (It's called democracy). Should the State allow one Religion to take precedence over another? Not according to the constitution. Should it allow religious activities on public domain? As long as their not breaking any laws.

The Problem is, Christians have come to think of America as a Christian nation. There can be no such thing. Christ is building his body and it is not bordered by water or foreign land. We should participate to the extent that democracy allows but not expect the world to reflect Christ.

2007-10-12 08:13:38 · answer #4 · answered by Gypsy Priest 4 · 0 1

1st of all,

Creationism, without religious creed, is not a 1st amendment violation. The problem with teaching creationism is that it is bad science, and is better taught in a philosophy class.

2nd,

Gays do have equal rights and due process. Animus against gays is not the cause of "denial" of gay marriage. You should really look into the law on this one. The public has a governing right in the state of marriage, as it is a contractual coporation of two estsates into one. We the people have a governing interest in determing what constitutes a valid marriage, as we the people have a governing interest in marriage. There are secular arguements to be made for not having gay marriage (several gays I know support and oppose gay marraige), and there are secular arguements for teaching creationism as critical thought.

2007-10-12 08:00:44 · answer #5 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 0 2

Truthfully, our laws are based on Christianity. The settlers that came to America, came her to pursue the freedom to serve God in the way they felt fit. Our constitution was built on it so there is no way of getting around religion within our government systems. Therefore, we will always face controversy about that subject.

2007-10-12 08:16:20 · answer #6 · answered by CILLA 1 · 1 1

It feels like a substantial attempt to return up with a respond on your over-simplified outlook. Creationism interior the generic public colleges has already been governed unconstitutional via the wonderful courtroom. The courtroom struck down a Louisiana regulation coping with that. gay marriage is legal interior the state of Massachusetts via fact that the state's optimum courtroom lied on the subject of the state shape. gay marriage isn't legal in the different state interior the rustic and that i might say that Christianity's classic condemnation of gay habit has lots to do with why. yet for my section, there is not any violation of the 1st modification in any respect only because of the fact a regulation is in keeping with a ethical value that individuals have discovered from the Bible. have you ever heard of "Thou shalt no longer bare fake witness" ? How approximately "Thou shalt no longer thieve" and "Thou shalt no longer kill" ? This u . s . does no longer and could no longer "forget approximately" the equivalent risk-free practices Clause of the 14th modification except and till it gets repealed. yet have self belief me, that's going to take VOLUMES for me to describe how worry-free that's to misconstrue the 14th modification. No, this u . s . shouldn't enable any "particular faith" to "over capacity" the government. It on no account has got here approximately and it on no account will. This u . s . is a "Christian u . s ." insofar because of the fact the undeniable fact that a majority of the individuals and their elected leaders are Christian. it rather is a fact. era. This u . s . isn't an OFFICALLY "Christian u . s . -- like Israel has Judaism as its actual faith and prefer many eu and Latin American international places are formally Catholic international places. yet to assert that all of us comprehend FOR A fact that a majority of folk interior the U. S. are Christians isn't the comparable difficulty as asserting that the government is formally Christian .... like Israel and the different international places i discussed.

2016-12-14 15:44:41 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

some of the laws are already based on so called Christianity.

2007-10-12 07:57:47 · answer #8 · answered by . 5 · 0 0

The wall of separation between church and state needs to be and remain absolute.

2007-10-12 08:49:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Oh Great Goddess NO. Why would any one want that? It would be like the Dark Ages all over again

2007-10-12 08:06:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers