His film was a documentary, and had the basic science correct.
"The nation's top climate scientists are giving An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore's documentary on global warming, five stars for accuracy."
Besides which, Gore has put a lot of effort into spreading information about global warming besides making "An Inconvenient Truth". He deserved to share the award with the IPCC scientists for his efforts.
2007-10-12 06:20:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dana1981 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
HE SAID HE INVENTED THE INTERNET?!?! WHAT?!! and we give this guy a Nobel Peace Prize.... doesnt that devalue the contribution of Ghandi, Mother Therisa and Martin Luther King just a little bit? why dont you DO something for the world not just regurgitate crap science which has been graphed up to look nice and horribly misconstrued in the process.
FACT: 95% of green house gases are H2O (a fact which these so called climate scientists neglect to mention)
FACT: Humans account for less than half a precent of all greenhouse gases in the atmosphere with water taken into account
FACT: the earth goes though geological cycles of warming and cooling on the time scale of thousands of years and we are WAY over due for one
FACT: it is only a matter of time before the icecaps melt and cause the north atlantic current to shift, resulting in global cooling and the next Ice Age
stop listening to the crap you hear on TV you lemmings. do some real research from non afilliated organization and real scientists.
2007-10-12 06:36:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by nacsez 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Lol, Not a darn thing. What did they say? That he got the prize for publicizing man made global warming. Wow, does that ever de-value that award (if it hasn't been done already). Surprised they didn't give the award to Iran for publicizing their fake offer to help stabilize Iraq, while they are funding the terrorist there. Al Gore makes his docu-comedy on global warming issue that not only can they not prove, but it gets debunked more and more everyday, all the while living in lavish non-green houses, flying around the country using more carbon than the average liberal nut case (not that I care) and he get a Nobel prize for publicizing. Fixing? Oh no...no not fixing, or doing anything..just publicizing. Is it time for the nurse to come give them there meds yet?
2007-10-12 06:03:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Opoohwan 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
"Materialistic ideology has subverted the learn of organic and organic and cosmological origins so as that the definitely content cloth of those sciences has grow to be corrupted. the project, subsequently, isn't in easy terms that technology is getting used illegitimately to sell a materialistic worldview, yet that this worldview is actively undermining medical inquiry, maximum advantageous to incorrect and unsupported conclusions approximately organic and organic and cosmological origins. on an identical time, sensible layout (identity) provides a promising medical option to materialistic theories of organic and organic and cosmological evolution -- an option it relatively is looking increasing theoretical and empirical help." there is extra in this information superhighway internet site that explains how the "valid" businesses somebody else used as returned-up are arising with their theories and forcing their individuals to alter their writing whether that's not in line with the organization. i think of interior the arriving months and years we can see further and further respected scientists talk out regarding the worldwide warming scam. The founding father of the climate Channel has a very easy graph that for sure shows the correlation between our CO2 emissions and worldwide warming. wager what? there is none. the advice does not help the belief.
2016-10-22 03:50:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Note that Gore shares the Nobel with the IPCC. Together they deserve it, the IPCC for proving that global warming is real, and Gore for making that known to the world.
The Prize documentation spells out how global warming threatens world peace by threatening struggles for resources, food, and water, in a warming world. The US military is very concerned:
http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/?p=1190
Great website for unbiased scientific information on global warming:
http://profend.com/global-warming/
2007-10-12 05:55:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bob 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
It's harder for people to shoot straight when they are rolling around laughing at his movie?
Environmentalists have been making war mongering conservatives look like amateurs, when it comes to slaughtering the innocent, for decades.
They get away with it because their friends in the media allow them to do their killing off camera.
2007-10-12 08:01:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Victor S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Global warming = Junk science
2007-10-12 05:46:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
it should bring nations together to cut off trade with opec
2007-10-12 07:12:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You think it was Science fiction?!? He wasn't exaggerating...
2007-10-12 07:44:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Toby B 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Which oil company do you work for?
2007-10-12 05:41:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Elana 7
·
3⤊
3⤋