He has placed us in two conflicts, and basically frowned at the rest of the world by doing his own thing. He has ignored our borders, literally. There are places where one can simply walk across as was shown on 60 minutes by Quinones. He has totally ignored the declining dollar.
Is this man trying to bring in his New World Order? A weak USA economy can send the whole world down the drain overnight. With a floodgate of illegals, it could offfset the moral fiber of a nation.
I wonder is he trying to live out a twisted ideology?
2007-10-11 22:53:10 · 10 answers · asked by shawnLacey 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
He's weakening our economy in order to strengthen his, Cheney's, and Halliburton's.
2007-10-11 22:56:43 · answer #1 · answered by Negligence 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The deliberate weakening of the economy has a great deal to do with the unified public outcry that prevented the immigration reform bill from passing. I think we shook the powers that be a bit, and they are doing this to regain control--by keeping us too busy trying to survive to interfere with their plans again. Which happens to be implementing the North American Union. If we won't accept it then they will tear down what we have to give us no choice. The war in Iraq is in part a diversion, and the war on terror in general will be used as an excuse to unify Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Besides, we need more citizens to build up our troops if we're going to keep fighting!
2007-10-11 23:25:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where pray tell did your info on the economy come from?
Despite problems in the housing industry the stock markets are hitting all time highs and the job market recorded over 150,000 NEW jobs last MONTH.
As far as the borders you got me there.
But there is good news, it seems some of those I As made it to Canada and discovered their 2 year freebie on housing and medicine. Now what do you think is going to happen when that news makes back to old Mexico.
2007-10-11 23:07:13 · answer #3 · answered by CFB 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, dude, that became GWB. The financial gadget became no longer weakened in one day - the recession started a twelve months in the past. Obama happened alongside, is all Obama like maximum black human beings do no longer pick to fail at his activity. He would not pick u.s. to fail the two. If u.s. and Obama fail, black 'therapy' might regress by using twenty years and Lawd knows we don't pick that
2016-10-20 06:53:01 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Typical liberal pap. Heres a few facts you and Nancy seem to have conveniently "forgot" as first what placed us in two conflicts is al qaeda and wtc which clinton ignored and if the rest of the world was being frowned upon, then why was there a coalition ...GENIUS???.
first lets talk about twisted ideology.
36000 carded requests for pork spending unrelated to the defense bill WITHOUT DEBATE authored by pelosi with the clear attempt to bind our soldiers in the field for poltical favor.
29 BILLION of the same authored by Harry Reid with the quoted justification of ..."we didnt get our chance in the last republican budgets". Chance for what??? to confiscatorily tax the american public to death?
757gate
a race to socialized medicine that actually defines people making up to 80 thousand a year as in need. First, Id love to make that much but beyond that heres a newsflash....BUSH, not the liberal extremists put in place a pre tax acount to pay for medical bills which works just fine and get this...its administered privately and is controlled by the consumer. thats a brand new concept for most liberals. let the consumer get more of what he or she legitimately earns without burdensome regulation and freedom from confiscatory taxation.
clinton...the largest tax increase in us history and the taxation of social security
bush smokin hot dow, record low unemployment..TWO TAX CUTS... i spent mine, but im sure being the good liberal extremist you are you sent yours back
and finally bush takes responsilbility for his votes contrary to pre flip flop clinton and edwards who voted FOR THE WAR!!!
and as far as bush placing us in these conflicts...heres a few more facts you "forgot" about.
uss cole,
clinton no response
wtc one
clinton no response
african embassy bombings
clinton no response
at least six chances to capture or kill bin laden in sudan
clinton no response
AND YOU THINK BUSH PUT US IN THESE CONFLICTS???
think hard before you sling mud here polticially. theres lots of us WORKING americans who actually understand al qaeda and want to stem this threat despite the grandstanding and posturing of the pelosi/reid regime. there is one thing youve done successfully here, however and i have no cause to argue with you over it.
you have successfully demonstrated the urgent need to vote conservative this election. the type of ideology that can bring the us to ruin is aptly displayed here but it has nothing whatsoever to do with Bush.
2007-10-11 23:36:39 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no bush is just fine he has good intention sits just that the evil hes trying to beat is outweighing him but eventually i beleive justice will prevail cut the man some slack he has the weight of the country on his shoulders do you honestly think he enjoys being called all those names pple call him im sure he tries to avoid it but he has to do what he has to do
2007-10-11 22:57:37 · answer #6 · answered by ladyluck 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Last I checked, our economy was doing fine. You must be thinking of Bill Clinton.
2007-10-11 22:56:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No but the democraps will do there best to ruin it.
2007-10-11 22:57:32 · answer #8 · answered by redlegman64 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
yes
2007-10-11 22:55:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
yes.
2007-10-11 22:57:45 · answer #10 · answered by cityquestioner 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋